oh.. its just an old site that randomly popped up, I knew I had seen the image before so I checked the origin, thought it was some 4chan image, meh... MINUS THESE COMMENTS
I posted this on top and I think it was one of my better ideas... a possible way to stop trolling is if someone amasses a certain number of -'s in a day they lose the privilege to comment for a week, or something. What I mean is their NET minus score for the day. So if you had 100+'s and 100-'s in a day, you'd break even at 0. So if you comment a lot you're not in any danger unless you just generally being an *ssh*le to everyone, in which case a week without commenting is pretty justified
... such as a "SITES BY POSITIVE PEOPLE" section which randomly displays sites from people who met a certain number of net +'s the previous day. These are my ideas, I am an ignorant fool who knows nothing about coding and how difficult this would be, but the ideas themselves makes sense to me.
Also, a possible way to stop trolling is if someone amasses a certain net number of -'s in a day they lose the priveledge to comment for a week, or something. What I mean is their net minus score for the day is like -2000. So if you had 100+'s and 100-'s in a day, you'd break even at 0. So if you comment a lot you're not in any danger unless you just generally being an *ssh*le to everyone, in which case a week without commenting is pretty justified. Maybe even a reward for + comments...
The hall of fame shouldn't be voted on by the regular users. The limbo system seems okay but it would kind of will exclude a lot of the old classics. Basically, every new site that becomes decently popular is going to be nominated for the hall of fame. I'd say the limbo system would work, but only if the featured users are the only ones able to vote. They [as a whole] have my trust.
thehuntor's recent comments: