Who Murdered the Most People?
Created on: October 4th, 2006
Who Murdered the Most People?
lol, comments

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.27) 3,148 68 3,166

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
2 3 0 5 91,715

Inbound links:

views url
44 https://www.bing.com
28 https://www.reddit.com/r/justneckbeardthings/comments/3eny5n/thi
25 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=who%20murdered%20the%20most%20people
18 http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/63969521
15 http://www.boston.com/community/forums/sports/patriots/on-the-fr

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >>
October 16th, 2006
(0)
...its people like you who give athiests a bad name. Nothing of what you showed could even in the slightest bit link barbaric behavior to Atheism. The numbers that you showed was a product of dictatorship and irrisponsible leadership, NOTHING to do with atheism. What you are doing is spreading predjudice propaganda with a motive wich is very UN-Catholic of you, to spread hate, unjust nonsence to a website wich is suppose to entertain people. Instead you start this mindless argument... tisk tisk
October 16th, 2006
(0)
Atheists aren't even a group. "They" don't do anything collectively.
October 16th, 2006
(0)
not funny.
October 18th, 2006
(0)
The number isn't made up, though it does encompass a large enough number to equal annihilation for a few countries in Europe if they were to all happen at once. Of course the crusades happened over a period of a few centuries. The first crusade started in the late 11th century and others (like the Crusade of Varna) lasted through the 16th-17th century (if not longer). We are not talking an over-night vanishing. This is also the deaths caused by all sides (though the Catholics were the main killers).
October 18th, 2006
(0)
Also, there has been no case made linking ANY political style to atheism. This is because atheism is specifically no belief in gods. There isn't any dogma on a way to live or who to follow. In fact communism is very dogmatic and religious in nature. You are not to question the upper tiers, not to speak ill of the government, not to think or question them. This is contrary to the skepticism (an atheistic trait). In reality, not even half of communist countries have been lead by atheists (despite pop opinion).
October 19th, 2006
(0)
I come here for laughter. I not laugh. Mark it zero.
October 19th, 2006
(0)
Quote Whetstone: "As for school, I haven't been to school in a number of years." .... yeah man, its blatently apparent. Your YTMND is FALSE... it is GOD who has killed the most people. In fact... its part of his "PLAN" he so far has killed... 100% of the people on Earth to fit his "PLAN" so... perhaps you should fix your YTMND.
October 20th, 2006
(0)
whetstone: "I haven't been to school in a number of years." - lolololololololololololololol
October 21st, 2006
(0)
I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPP
October 21st, 2006
(0)
I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPP
October 21st, 2006
(0)
I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPP
October 21st, 2006
(0)
I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM! I SUPPORT TERRORISM!
October 21st, 2006
(0)
HAY WHETSTONE MADE ANY EYE BABIES LATELY?
October 21st, 2006
(-1)
The problem with atheism is it is easy to think you are above the law. When there is no higher authority you may do what ever you want without consequences. I would like to see atheists examine their own beliefs and consider the existence of God objectively. Do you outright deny the existence of God without a second thought because of your own fear. If he exists you will be held accountable.
October 22nd, 2006
(-1)
^ Lotus, your attitude here is sanctimonious and insulting. Chances are most athiests live by the "love thy neighbor, do unto others" notions of Christianity, doing so out of love of humanity rather than a strict love of God. The basis for rejecting religious doctine isn't rooted in the rejection of morality, but rather the desire for intellectual growth.
October 22nd, 2006
(-1)
I am sorry if you were offended because of the above appearing sanctimonious or insulting. But I stand by everything I have said. It was more of a justification for why some world leader’s commit atrocities. It did however neglect the fact that some people are immoral, from every religion. As for religion inhibiting intellectual growth, that can be true if you do as the catholic church had done. Care must be taken that your scientific understanding is not grounded in scripture, as some of scripture is symbolic. The catholic church takes pride in her belief that she has authority over doctrine.
October 22nd, 2006
(-1)
Thank you Lotus for addressing me gracefully. As for what you said being a "justification for why some world leaders commit atrocities" that indeed follows the logic of this YTMND which is faulty overall, as so many others have already pointed out. It is difficult to say whether such leaders who committed atrocities did so as to "deny their maker," if in fact they did not believe a maker existed to begin with.
October 22nd, 2006
(-1)
I don't feel "deny" is the best word to use in your arguments (regardless of its use in the Bible, ie "you will deny me three times") because it suggests an existing belief met with haughty defiance rather than honest confusion or polite disagreement. In the case of the question you posed earlier, I now get the feeling that it was similarly honest as opposed to a mere sanctimonious fit, so I apologize as well.
October 22nd, 2006
(-1)
As for the your mentions of the Catholic church...regardless of one's opinion of the Vatican we are no longer living in the 12th century. Coincidentally IIRC, many Catholics are now willing to consider that aspects of the Bible are likely symbolic. Harboring negativity toward Catholicism vs. Protestanism is counterproductive in this day and age.
October 22nd, 2006
(-1)
Your right, this would be more accurate if it encompassed atheists and agnostics.
October 22nd, 2006
(-1)
^ Eh? I can only interpret this as a disregard for any arguments against this YTMND, those arguments being that mere atheism (or agnosticism) did *not* account for the carrying out of various atrocities. I invite you to read: http://www.positiveatheism.org/mail/eml8341.htm for some added perspective. I was not addressing agnosticism in my reply, your mention of agnostics seemingly amounts to confused name-calling.
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
"The problem with atheism is it is easy to think you are above the law. When there is no higher authority you may do what ever you want without consequences." Buddhists are above Christian laws, yet they seem a lot more peaceful. You can do anything that atheists can do, and you will face the EXACT SAME CONSEQUENCES. Whether God exists or doesn't. Tell me if I'm wrong, but I thought that God punishes atheists and Christians both for murder. Or, they receive no punishment at all in the afterlife...
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
if there is no god. So, really, what you're saying is not that they're above any laws, but they only follow the laws that they believe exist. Also, there are laws that govern action in real life. That's what governments are for. It's not a coincidence that civilizations develop these systems of laws. The difference between govermental punishment and religious punishment is that one is demonstrative and one is retributive. Another difference, especially with Christianity, is that you can get out...
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
of your punishment for free if you just repent and feel sorry for what you have done. That's not really an effective deterrent. In fact the secular system (not atheist, mind you, secular. Attacking atheism is like attacking shadows. There's nothing there. There is no organization called atheism, there is no moral code called atheism, there is simply a lack of belief in god or gods, by definition, just as a shadow is a lack of light) does a much better job of giving people incentive to act lawfully.
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
"I would like to see atheists examine their own beliefs and consider the existence of God objectively. Do you outright deny the existence of God without a second thought because of your own fear. If he exists you will be held accountable." I would like to see an objective basis for the soundness of the claims made in the bible. If you cannot provide one, then by the burden of proof and the principle of sufficient reason I cannot objectively give the bible's claims any merit.
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
I don't deny the existence of god at all. Atheism has nothing to do with denying the existence of god. All that is required to be an atheist is a lack of accepting a belief in god. Do you believe that I have 5 dollars in my hand? Certainly you have no reason to believe it, but you don't have any reason to believe that I don't. You simply withhold belief until given proper reason. This is atheism. If withheld belief that I had 5 dollars in my hand, I would say that you were rational.
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
If I were god, and created you, and you, through your own reason, withheld belief that I had 5 dollars in my hand, should I smite you for your lack of faith? Are you not responsible for your belief? Is this not a dishonest question, as you have no belief, and if you did have belief would have a belief only as strong as the evidence that proves that I have 5 dollars in my hand? Would it not be my fault if I couldn't prove to you that I had 5 dollars in my hand, and not yours?
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
What, exactly, am I afraid of? I guarantee you that I live a better life than you do, morally. I don't really care whether or not you doubt that, I am responsible for my own actions and I always do what I deem to be correct. Is it that I fear being held responsible? Or is it that I don't wish to waste my life on something that I have no reason to believe? I have as much reason to believe in Scientology as in Christianity, which is to say none, and it would be WRONG for me to believe in either one of them...
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
unless God or Xenu gives me rational proof of his existence and the validity of the claims made in their respective teachings. Period. Keep your fearmongering to yourself. I fear nothing, and if God exists then I'd say, "What up. How's it going?", but I have no reason to believe that he does. I'd prefer the Greek gods, anyways, they're a lot more exciting and realistic.
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
^ Nuroticat. I was referring to your statement "because it suggests an existing belief met with haughty defiance rather than honest confusion or polite disagreement. " This implies atheism by ‘hauntly defiance,’ and agnostic by 'honest confusion.' There is no middle ground here, someone is either theistic, agnostic, or atheist. I am not agreeing with this ytmnd, because it takes statistics way out of context.
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
October 22nd, 2006
(0)
A buddhist and an "atheist" hold the same view on Christianity, a Christian and an "atheist" hold the same view on buddhism. The "atheist" respects both views, and thus concludes that neither is right for sure. The Christian, however, holds that all buddhists are wrong and will burn in hell, as with every other person who belongs to any other religion, and any other Christian sect in some cases. Hooray for compassion!
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
Korf, by being a theist (believing in any God at all) one is automatically disqualified from being an atheist (one who believes in no God at all). Saying that theists are atheists to other gods is rather irrelivant. Theists believe in one God to the exclusion of others. Their worldview dictates disbelief in other gods. Atheists on the other hand must come up with some other excuse or reason why NO gods at all exist. So you see the theist and the atheist are in different boats all together.
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
^not necessarily. Not all theists rule out other gods. And it is precisely the correct characterization because atheism is not a belief. It is a lack of belief. If you lack belief, you meet all the necessary and sufficient requirements, by definition. By definition. This is important.
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
"Atheists on the other hand must come up with some other excuse or reason why NO gods at all exist." This is most certainly not the case. I don't have to justify the non-existence of anything. It is logically impossible to disprove the existence of God, Allah, or anything that could differentiate between them. THE BUREN OF PROVE IS ON THE PERSON WHO MAKES A POSITIVE ASSERTION. This is a basic logical principle. You don't need a reason to not have belief in anything other than a lack of reason to believe.
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
*BURDEN, obviously. Now, if you say that bullsh*t one more time I swear God should strike you down for being retarded. "Atheists on the other hand must come up with some other excuse or reason why NO gods at all exist." Stop. Never again. God does not approve of such ridiculous irrationality.
(0)
gee-whiz, but I dunno...it just seems a liiiitle better to be an atheist looking for answers than a "christian " who USES HIS FAITH AS HIS PRINCIPLE EXCUSE TO TORTURE, RAPE, AND MUTILATE... but in a sense, yer right...Atheists "DO" have A LOT more difficulty in finding justification for such acts...they haven't got such a CONVENIENT EXCUSE like YOU DO. meh...lucky you...have fun raping and pillaging...
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
You keep repeating yourself Korf. But no amount of repetition will make it any more true. Just because you say you merely have 'lack of belief' in a God you are also saying that Christians or theists are wrong- meaning that you have an assertive belief. Stop hiding and own up to your assertions. And remember- you are in my comments not vice-versa. You have no place telling me to stop.
(0)
Zip zop zoobidy bop!
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
Bullsh*t to English Translator: Bullsh*t: Stop making religious YTMND's! They are offensive and not politically correct! I'm gonna tattle tale to Max on you! Oooooo, your'e gonna be in big trouble, I'm telling, nya nya nya! English Translation: I need to harass everyone who has different religious views than I do, so I demand that anything that offends me should be banned, even though I could just as easily use my brain and not watch it, or get a life and do something useful with my time.
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
^LOL
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
"No amount of repetition will make it any more true." Right back at ya. This statement is ironic coming from someone who held no qualms about unleashing multiple graceless YTMND's on the community for the sole purpose of informing people of the "truth." You don't want to encourge discussion, you want to point fingers. Nuff's enuff.
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
@ Lotus107: I was saying that the word deny "suggests an existing belief (in God) met with haughty defiance" which does not equal athiesm. It also has further negative connotation (ie the denying of guilt) Finger-pointing language FTL. The point I was making initially is that athiests do not necessarily disbelieve in a god so as to be haughtily defiant, or because it would enable them to be immoral or above any "laws."
October 23rd, 2006
(0)
Lol, flawed association.
October 24th, 2006
(0)
Although they seem organized, facts are faulty. These dictatorships you speak of could easily have had soldiers that believe in the very god you believe in. You are using the dictator and country as a representitive. And, numbers are NEVER exact when it comes to massive calculations like such. YTMND is for humor, and not too many people are going to be "opening their eyes" on YTMND. Yes, I am an Atheist. No, this is not a counter attack. 3'd, has a cause, but not very funny. At all.
October 25th, 2006
(-1)
this is wrong and offensive.
October 26th, 2006
(0)
+5 for Max threatening to ban you, but -4 for flawed logic and just being a dumbass in general.
October 27th, 2006
(0)
i dont care if your wrong or not, atheists suck.
October 30th, 2006
(0)
Polend, FTW
November 1st, 2006
(0)
i'm just wondering if all of your religious sites were intended to educate about christianity or to just bash atheism? i am very active in my church and it's the most important thing in my life, i am no where near athiest. HOWEVER, persecuting someone for there beliefs is definetly not the best way to bring them to christ. i merely say this because if the point of your YTMNDs is to cause controversy, i'm sure you got it. but then i ask, is that how you want other people to see christians or your church?
November 3rd, 2006
(0)
Thanks for being Bias!
November 9th, 2006
(0)
November 12th, 2006
(0)
txsweetie8602 nicely summed up one of the biggest problems with whetstone's methodology. Serves as a fitting conclusion to this mess. And on that note, much needed silence follows...
November 15th, 2006
(0)
malaria is the real culprit. half of the people who ever lived on Earth died from it.
November 27th, 2006
(0)
ummm, the nazis. dumbass.
November 28th, 2006
(0)
I havent read everyones comments and I care not to... just a quit note about Hitler... 11 million people died as a result of him and thats not including war casualties... if you counted them it would be well more the 11 million people (6 million jews, the rest were Polish, retards, handicaped, f*gs, opposing political partys, blacks, and most importantly... OPPOSERS TO THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH) clearly Hitler was of the roman catholic church dispite his jew-ness
November 28th, 2006
(0)
your numbers are fantasticly un-accurate...
November 29th, 2006
(-1)
offensive. The problem with you morons is that the moment you die is the first moment we're able to say "we told you so, dumbass." Too bad you won't be able to hear it.
November 30th, 2006
(0)
if an aithiest kills someone and you attribute that death to the fact that they are aithiest, why dont you count the death toll of christian george bush's ordering?
December 4th, 2006
(0)
people dont care. every ones just going to blame each other till we all just kill each other from our own stupidty
(0)
like peppercorns in a grinder, we will repeat EVERY mistake we have ever made, and the stakes will continue to grow with our capacity for destruction. many among us say Christ is coming at the end, but how can he ever get here if we keep repeating our history and never moving forward? for all ANY of us know (but nobody has ANY authority to claim with any certainty), humanity is trapped in a temporal paradox of our own design, and Jesus can't get IN until WE get ourselves OUT...
December 6th, 2006
(-1)
WOW i'm so enlightened now. Thanks random guy on the internet! I'm going to look at my life so much differently now.
December 11th, 2006
(0)
atheism=irrationality mastersitsu=12 years old therefore also irrational
December 11th, 2006
(0)
Atheists say that ignorant people kill in the name of religion. No, it was not the atheism that killed A QUARTER BILLION people, it was the arrogant elitism, that those at the top have the right to say who lives and who dies, because they know better. Because they have a Five Year Plan for the nation. Because they have the science on their side. But death is death, whether a suicide/homicide bombing, a gunshot on the streets of St Louis, an abortion, or a dictator's whims.
December 21st, 2006
(0)
That was pretty enlightening.
December 21st, 2006
(0)
"if an aithiest kills someone and you attribute that death to the fact that they are aithiest, why dont you count the death toll of christian george bush's ordering?" It would be a war for oil according to many people, so thats moot.
December 24th, 2006
(0)
5 for truth
December 24th, 2006
(0)
Good
December 26th, 2006
(0)
good reasearch.
December 29th, 2006
(0)
aww so close i guessed catholics awwwww shucks
December 31st, 2006
(0)
Great f*cking movie. But what about Scientologists? :|
December 31st, 2006
(0)
You rule. But nothing about Scientologists?! Gasp.
January 2nd, 2007
(0)
BEAT THAT RECORD!
January 5th, 2007
(0)
No sh*t. Us Atheists own you sorry religious sons of bitches,
January 8th, 2007
(0)
YEAH! GO ATHIESTS! I'm a real pirate bitch
January 15th, 2007
(0)
just another reason why catholics suck
January 15th, 2007
(0)
lol, on of the most commented on of all time
January 21st, 2007
(0)
http://www.evilbible.com/Murder.htm As you constantly say, read the whole thing
February 2nd, 2007
(0)
^^^^True dat.
February 4th, 2007
(0)
F*CKING F*GGOT OF COURSE ATHEISTS DID MORE KILLINGS ITS BC THERES LOADS OF EM. THATS LIKE SAYING ASIANS DIE MORE YEARLY WHEN THERES WAY MORE OF THEM THAN THE OTHER RACES. WAY TO BE SMART PAL. CRY MORE.
February 22nd, 2007
(0)
Polands invasion also led to ww2 with a death toal at aprox 80 milion , not counting the resulting issues that came from WW2 and it's climax, you are WAY off
April 14th, 2007
(0)
It's not asking whose people were murdered most.
March 12th, 2007
(-2)
YOU PIECE OF SH*T F*CK YOURSELF
March 17th, 2007
(0)
the balogna is in the nest, the pastrami is recyclable.
March 17th, 2007
(0)
im sorry to tell you this...but you're wrong, the correct answer is, human kind = (
March 18th, 2007
(-1)
people who turned this into an itellectual debate in comments=dumb.
March 27th, 2007
(0)
1 because you said "open your eyes and see the truth", and thats f"ing dumb
April 3rd, 2007
(0)
I can't hear you la-la-la-la-la-la-la
(0)
Your logic suggests that a government would kill people because they were an atheist regime killing believers, when in fact, it was because they killed people who stood up against the regime. Also, you forget things like crusades, the spanish inquisition, and other numbers. You fail.
April 5th, 2007
(0)
My country lost the greatest percentage of her population than any country in WWII. Almost 6 million Poles, that's 1 out of every 6 citizens of Poland were slaughtered by the Nazi invasion and occupation. You think you are cutting edge, clever in some way that you can drop the name of Poland, and end up attaching the atrocious Holocaust to my country?! Take a f*cking history lesson, and while you're at it, take a science class, you bible-thumping hillbilly dumbf*ck!
(0)
non-american history books are actually hard to come by, at least in my area. I'd rather talk to somebody who'd been there or has a close relative who had, anyhoo. My grandmother is german, but was barely a teenager at the wars end. She still knew enough that when a country was broken and it's families scattered, many, MANY young men were DRAFTED from the very countries that were conquered, and forced onto the front lines to be used as shock troops, human shields, reinforcements...I HATE being German...
April 14th, 2007
(0)
Write a book and quit trying to educate the ignorant people of YTMND. You can't do anything for the people on this site. Write some kinda phiosophical book for people who actually r_e_a_d_b_o_o_k_s and who can actually grasp your message and who are willing to be educated.
July 17th, 2007
(0)
You mean... people like atheists?
May 1st, 2007
(0)
Dental Plan!
May 1st, 2007
(0)
You can't blame ALL atheists for the actions of of governments who were anti-theism. Firstly, not all atheists are against organized religion. Probably not even most. The word is "atheist", not "anti-theist". "Abiotic" would be a stone, not anti-biotics. Secondly, atheists are not part of any organized church or governmental system like Poles or Catholics are. You can't blame a non-theist for the actions of another. There aren't any commonly-held beliefs between non-theist, hence "non-theist".
May 7th, 2007
(-1)
It's our job, so shut for f*cking mouth. Semper Fi
(0)
ZEEZ! It seems like EVERYBODY has STILL forgotten IDAHO! Those durned, shifty eyed Idahodian rebel scum are nuthin but trouble. Trust me. ya just can't trust those sonsa bee itches.
May 23rd, 2007
(0)
is it still cool to post here?
May 23rd, 2007
(0)
Yes it is.
June 3rd, 2007
(0)
Is it yes?
May 23rd, 2007
(0)
I forgot about this YTMND. There are no many fallacies in this argument, it's ridiculous. Counting Muslim murders in the last century, but counting catholic murders from over 700 years ago. Calling world leaders who oppose organized religion atheists is not always accurate. Many dictators have imposed their religion or beliefs then outlawed OTHER forms of religion. That does not make them atheists. I bet he's even counting the Nazis as atheists. This YTMND is very poorly researched.
June 25th, 2007
(0)
July 2nd, 2007
(0)
Here's one for ya: Why did atheists killed the most people? Is it A) because they're evil. B) They're doomed beings. C) For fun. D) They got tired of *ssh*les like you parading their annoying beliefs around in places they don't belong, like governments, my front doorstep, and YTMND. I'm glad to see you've been gone since April. Hopefully it's because the atheists killed you.
July 8th, 2007
(0)
262 million? Are you f*cking high? Cut back on the blood of christ. The totalitarian socialist regimes of the twentieth century may have been secular, but they were not rational. They came about as a result of a starving, victimized people grasping at straws. The secularism of these regimes is inconsequential. They were irrational, dogmatic, and insanely nationalistic (the one brain disease worse than religion). Look up Trofim Lysenko and Rootless Cosmopolitans. It might make you less of dumbass.
July 8th, 2007
(0)
a
July 14th, 2007
(0)
Long read, but seeing religion get FLAWLESSED was worth it. Example of how/why this guy/ytmnd is ignorant: Hitler was the cause of 55mil+ deaths(all of WWII, he earned it) "to uphold the race laws to the limit and to resist mercilessly the poisoner of all nations, international Jewry"- Adolf Hitler April 30, 1945 http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm <---teh number http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/hitler.html <---teh quote ^^^hey look i didnt just pull numbers from my *ss. Also, c*cks
July 16th, 2007
(0)
" Too many sources to credit" Probably just like your statistics! "yeah im not saying where i got my facts from, they are so awesome that i just got them from everywhere! including wikipedia and my ass."
July 16th, 2007
(1)
lol this again.
July 16th, 2007
(0)
hahhahaha
July 16th, 2007
(0)
This world would be a much better place if athiests everywhere slaughtered all christians and muslims. F*ck religion!
July 16th, 2007
(0)
I'd just like to point out that the groups aforementioned are all Organized groups EXCEPT for atheists. Also: they didn't kill in the name of atheism. So, lawl, Apple =/= orange.
July 16th, 2007
(-1)
5 for using The Price is Right.
July 16th, 2007
(0)
Not this sh*t again... RESPONSE YTMND: http://whoreally.ytmnd.com/
July 16th, 2007
(0)
You forgot Jesus again... Oh wait here he is. http://heforgotsomething.ytmnd.com/
July 16th, 2007
(0)
LOL 5'd for masterfully re-igniting teh dramaz and lulzy religious debates
July 16th, 2007
(0)
Polish government circa 1938-1945 was not a dictatorship u f*cking idiot...
July 16th, 2007
(0)
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
July 16th, 2007
(1)
Over a million Muslims died in the Iran-Iraq war which Iran claimed as a Jihad. So stop getting your facts from Wikipedia f*ggot.
July 17th, 2007
(1)
OK, let's recap; Stalin was an Orthodox Christian, Maoism was a fusion of Marxism with Chinese mysticism, and whetstone is a sophist c*cksucker who relies on revisionist propaganda websites as "research". Nice try.
July 17th, 2007
(0)
I thought that this was worth a three or four at most, but here's a few extra stars for having to put up with all the hate. I like how so many people felt compelled to try to explain that Stalin and Mao and all the other mass genocide superstars weren't REAL atheists, but seem unable to comprehend that those who murder others tend not to be following the accepted teachings of the religion they claim as their own.
July 17th, 2007
(0)
Appeal to motive fallacy. We felt compelled to point out that Stalin and Mao weren't atheists because they WEREN'T, not because we're hurt. What kind of atheist is a practicing Orthodox Christian or Chinese mysticist? And I'm curious how you can suggest that a man like Hulagu Khan could approach Baghdad, tell the ruling caliphate that they should surrender or "see what God has willed", and then massacre nearly a million Arabs and cause untold property destruction. Hulaga (a Buddhist, curiously enough)
July 17th, 2007
(0)
made the matter clear; God, a force for which no compelling or unique reason to take his existence seriously exists, "told" him what his will concerning Baghdad was and everyone else just had to take his word for it. It's not merely suspiciously convenient, it's quite possibly schizophrenia.
July 17th, 2007
(0)
That should read, "I'm curious how you can suggest that a man like Hulagu Khan could approach Baghdad, tell the ruling caliphate that they should surrender or "see what God has willed", and then massacre nearly a million Arabs and cause untold property destruction, AND THEN be somehow exempt from criticism as an example of the innately irrational and violent nature of belief in the supernatural."
(0)
Greed is the biggest killer, regardless of religious beliefs. Also, you seem to have forgotten protestants on your list, there. There's a certain dictator who comes to mind that recognised himself as a protestant ... a Mr. Adolf something-or-other.
July 17th, 2007
(0)
interesting! yes maybe but idk
July 17th, 2007
(0)
fhail
July 17th, 2007
(0)
u didn't 4 get Poland
July 17th, 2007
(1)
"hi it's a site that doesn't outwardly bash religion when given the opportunit, so it must be crap!" -the internet
July 17th, 2007
(0)
im atheist and i don't care what people believin
July 17th, 2007
(0)
Ah yes, conflating atheism and facism/dictatorships. WELL DONE, U IS TEH MR. SMRTYPANTS!!!11
July 17th, 2007
(0)
lol its funny because your ignorant. the dictators didnt' kill those people cause they were aethiest you f*cking idiot they killed people organizing into groups, due to religion or any other thing like that, so they could keep people seperated and still in fear so they could keep their positions of power. it seems like it'd be easier to take the time you wasted makin this and actually think about the stuff your posting. kkthnx
July 17th, 2007
(0)
Wow, this might be good if it didn't have a firm Christian belief structure behind it. How about this, buddy: Go preach elsewhere. Do not compare dictatorships that are against any form of organized religion with that of genuine atheist beliefs. The two are not one and the same, mmk pumpkin?
July 17th, 2007
(0)
Atheists killed the most people, therefore God exists. uh huh.
July 17th, 2007
(0)
You speak the truth, sir.
July 19th, 2007
(-1)
This is one of the best YTMND's I've seen in many months. To upset the entire atheist crowd at once is hysterical. Especially that socialist loving mastersitsu. Here is another fact for all atheists... all gay men are also atheist.The real ideology behind the 262 million murders wasn't really atheism, it was leftism, socialism, what people calling themselves "liberal" these day believe in. It just happens all of those murdering scumbags were atheist. Also, Hitler hated Christianity.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
figures need to be in a %age or proportion form to make any sort of point. but thats impossible. so no, this means nothing to me. plus this cant be considered a real ytmnd.
July 22nd, 2007
(0)
lol
July 29th, 2007
(0)
August 11th, 2007
(2)
I killed the most people.
August 31st, 2007
(2)
This is bullsh*t in so many aspects.
September 1st, 2007
(0)
Problems here... how exactly do you label the so called "Atheist kills"... do you list communism itself as Atheism killing? Which doesn't really work, because there are plenty of religious communists.... just because the concept of it was made by an Atheist doesn't mean that it's being run, owned, and is killing for, the sake of Atheism. Last thing here... if somebody dies for a religion, of any kind, and it's the wrong one... technically, that person died for nothing. They could all be wrong...
October 20th, 2007
(0)
I thought it was E. Bob Barker
October 30th, 2007
(0)
This is ridiculous. One, those figures are grossly exaggerated, and two, they didn't murder them BECAUSE they were atheists. It's an unfair comparison - the Spanish Inquisition murdered their victims because of their religion, whereas regimes with no official religion didn't actually do it on basis of religion.
November 2nd, 2007
(0)
you win, never give up O.o
November 2nd, 2007
(0)
you win, never give up O.o
November 25th, 2007
(0)
that was funn...
February 14th, 2008
(0)
please excuse me while I grab my balls and raise my finger to the cross. Kiss my *ss galileons.
February 29th, 2008
(0)
Hell yeah! I'm a proud atheist and I'm proud that atheists are responsible for the most killings! We shall continue to kill more! The way I see it, I rather kill than to be killed. Take that dead boi ! 11!!!1!
July 27th, 2008
(0)
Hitler, who I'm sure is on your list of "atheists", was a Lutheran. Do your research.
August 23rd, 2008
(0)
If you mess with atheists, we put the boot up your ass. Quod erat demonstrandum, beyotch.
September 26th, 2008
(0)
IM IN UR COMMENTS TRUKKIN YOUR SEXXI YOU'VE BIN HIT BY THE |^^^^^^^^^^^^| |SEXY TRUCK | '|""";.., ___. |_..._...______===|= _|__|..., ] | "(@ )'(@ )""""*|(@ )(@ )*****(@ ONCE YOU'VE BEEN HIT, YOU HAVE TO HIT 8 PEOPLE! IF YOU GET HIT AGAIN YOU'LL KNO YOUR REALLI sexy! IF YOU BRAKE THE cHAIN, YOULL BE CURSED WITH UN*SEXYNESS FOR 10 YEARS SO PASS IT HIT WHO EVER YOU THINK IS sexy! |^^^^^^^^^^^^| |SEXY TRUCK | '|""";.., ___. |_..._...______===|= _|__|..., ] | "(@ )'(@ )""""*|(@ )(@ )*****(@ |^^^^^^^^^^^^| |SEXY TRUCK | '|""";.., ___. |_..._...______===|= _|__|..., ] | "(@ )'(@ )""""*|(@ )(@ )*****(@ |^^^^^^^^^^^^| |SEXY TRUCK | '|""";.., ___. |_..._...______===|= _|__|..., ] | "(@ )'(@ )""""*|(@ )(@ )*****(@ |^^^^^^^^^^^^| |SEXY TRUCK | '|""";.., ___. |_..._...______===|= _|__|..., ] | "(@ )'(@ )""""*|(@ )(@ )*****(@
October 6th, 2008
(1)
Wikipedia and Typepad blogs...good sources.
October 7th, 2008
(0)
262,000 =/= 262,000,000 "Too many sources to credit" :rolleyes:
December 6th, 2008
(2)
Hey whetstone I made your site funny: http://whet.ytmnd.com/ You can thank me later
March 21st, 2009
(0)
Funny how those people never killed anyone because they didn't believe in god. It was for other reasons. you fail.
April 18th, 2009
(-1)
Good site
August 10th, 2009
(0)
So anyone not affiliated with a major organized religion is responsible for over 200 million murders? Is this some kind of Scientology recruitment guilt trip tactic?
August 14th, 2009
(0)
i heard people with faces killed the most
September 17th, 2009
(0)
I have a better quiz. Who killed the most people: a)governments b)anarchists? If you guessed a, you're a winner!
September 17th, 2009
(-1)
Proud to say I didn't read any of the comments.
October 2nd, 2009
(0)
October 6th, 2009
(0)
It's Chuck Norris *ssh*les, didn't even have to see this site.
October 29th, 2009
(0)
Its interesting that rational people believe in nonsensical fairy tales and allow those to dictate rules for living their entire lives. And it's interesting that we no longer believe in Thor, the Thunder God. Religion is a way for people to escape. I dont know why you would want to escape, the beauty of the universe is very complex and mind blowing. Mostly, religion is an excuse to say "our team is better than your team" and beat someone up. An excuse, a sorry excuse. No different than gangs.
April 25th, 2010
(-1)
Communist and Socialist dictatorships have recognized that religion hte opiate of the masses...
August 29th, 2011
(0)
Convert to raptor jesus!
<< 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >>