lool. gr33n gr33n gr33n. you really are pathetic. why do you come here just to attack people out of nowhere? i mean, what is the point of attacking low intellect people for no reason? at least i let them give me a reason. you never did. it just shows how lowly you must think of yourself. makes sense.
one last thing: you ARE aware that i wasn't, like, agreeing with or pushing the concept. my problem with you was that you were extremely loud about not understanding it. you don't get it. YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT. are you aware of that? because with all the bullshit you typed, you just kept proving you do not understand. what DO you understand?
Mad Dog Soldier: When someone is nice to me and apologizes for something, I call them a "punk," I don't listen to them, and I continue on my stubborn, ass-backwards, low-intellect-shitstorm behavior pattern and make my self look even worse. Because the only way I can get off is by humiliating myself publicly. Next I'm going to find some 13 year olds to snapchat with!
so listen, i randomly posted (misquoting, i might add) a random old saying that had nothing to do with anything. and now you're posting an essay about what it means and why YOU are right and someone else is completely wrong. and now you have your excuse to shamelessly proclaim that you are like the top notch of society. it's embarrassing. this leads me to believe that you are a psychopath and please do not respond to any of my comments. ever.
You have proven that you are completely self absorbed. Fucking ass.
you're trying way to hard to look clever by deconstructing something for the sake of deconstructing it. i even felt bad and messaged you, apologizing for reacting in a mean way, when you accused me of being nice to try and get you to agree with me or something even though nothing i was saying was trying to persuade you in any way. i said "the saying is older than dirt" or something, as if to say "who cares, it's an old saying." now you're trying as hard as you can to look like you're "thinking freely" and "independently," or whatever your idea of that is, just for the hell of it. YOU'RE EVEN COMPARING YOURSELF TO WHAT YOU IDENTIFY AS THE ELITE OF SOCIETY! so great excuse for doing that.
what you're bitching about in the first place is a pretty abstract concept. it can be applied in different ways to different contexts. it's not by any means suggesting that ALL good intentions pave the road to hell. this is what you're assuming. so YOUR premise is fucked up, dude. not mine. have you ever tried "abstract thinking?" do you know what that means? because if so, i'd like you to define it for me without using google. the old saying is completely dependent on WHAT you're applying it to. i think you missed that part. going on your "super smart free thinker doctor/layer/engineer" tangent, from what i've seen it's most commonly used to describe religious people using religion as a base for committing "evil" acts, most commonly by the more liberal religious describing the fanatically religious.
and literally, EVERY ONE of your bullshit premises you’ve spun up incorrectly deconstruct the concept. Especially your building premise. Like, I can’t even begin to break that down for you. The more you bitch, the more you prove you do not understand (1) the concept (2) how to “deconstruct” something in an intelligent way (3) interact with people on the internet.
your attempts at seeming "smart" by logically breaking down the concept on a painfully preschool level is embarrassing. the whole idea is that people can achieve great levels of evil while believing they are doing the right thing.
Why not just think about it. Think outside the box. Or, just try thinking about things on a longer timeline. Not a 1 + 1 = 2 mentality. Which is what you literally did there lol.
Stardate 37857247 4 1 1 3: we were investigating an anomaly in Cheen space, a tiny unknown segment of the delta quadrant where the delta quadrent touches closest to home. There was a box. As we approached the box a tiny door opened and a screen emerged. This id what was playing on the screen... It was me, I was on the screen... Take a look, data.
janeable's recent comments:
You have proven that you are completely self absorbed. Fucking ass.
what you're bitching about in the first place is a pretty abstract concept. it can be applied in different ways to different contexts. it's not by any means suggesting that ALL good intentions pave the road to hell. this is what you're assuming. so YOUR premise is fucked up, dude. not mine. have you ever tried "abstract thinking?" do you know what that means? because if so, i'd like you to define it for me without using google. the old saying is completely dependent on WHAT you're applying it to. i think you missed that part. going on your "super smart free thinker doctor/layer/engineer" tangent, from what i've seen it's most commonly used to describe religious people using religion as a base for committing "evil" acts, most commonly by the more liberal religious describing the fanatically religious.
and literally, EVERY ONE of your bullshit premises you’ve spun up incorrectly deconstruct the concept. Especially your building premise. Like, I can’t even begin to break that down for you. The more you bitch, the more you prove you do not understand (1) the concept (2) how to “deconstruct” something in an intelligent way (3) interact with people on the internet.