Let's see.... Protestants get... Hitler, nearly the entire native american population, a few million africans during the 1800s from european colonization, both nuclear weapon attacks, vietnam, the catholics killed by cromwell, and a few other masterpeices.
And we're ignoring cases like the christian scientists where their religion causes the death of their own children.
I don't really think your assumptions that catholicism is the worst of christianity is correct.
I could explain it, I imagine... It's probably caused by an 11 (or more) second delay between the time you a rejected from commenting and this page crops up. If it didn't take that long, then I have no idea.
I can't stomach another one of these irrational argument acompanied with music pages. It's really offensive(although more than allowable) for you idiots to assert you have some perception of the universe I lack that allows you to dictate my fundmental beleives. Your appeals to majority are really inappropriate for the indeterminate. I seriously ask that if anyone beleives I have taken offense unreasonably, to contact me by PM.
Please. Until then, stop insulting my ability to decide for myself.
randomness is usually ok, but fad+unmatching randomness boils down to not funny. The second star is for the amount of time you spent making it, not for any quality.
Even though I've already commented and no one is going to pay attention to some 1voter, I have another misconception to point out. You use the phrase "in the begining there was nothing". This statement is not provable, and some models of the universe (such as a closed model) suggest there was never "nothing". Just wanted you to know about something that you may have not considered.
No, WRONG. Credible evidence abounds. Independent research, verifying some things for yourself is easy. I've done experiments for myself(classroom style: pitri dish+poison=immune to poison bacteria). When you can see for yourself by experimentation, there's no circular reasoning, you draw your conclusions from your own research. PM me if you would like to talk about how to run this and other experiments yourself.
In summary, the human notion of causality is derived from our perspective in a fairly expansive, fairly statistically consistant(in quantum terms) universe. This isn't as obnoxious as peterguy and merely misinterprets some modern physics, which I hope you should look into. It's beautiful.
A second misconception here is again with causality. This one goes back to the big bang. Your notion of causality is derived from the form "X preceds Y, and X is strongly related to Y therefor X caused Y". However modern physics suggests time is a limited circular dimension. Although it is not presently discernably finite, Time does(and "does" is the best word I can think of to describe it) not exist without the other dimensions for it to be projected accross.
It's a good attempt, however it is a distortion of a few things. It's all well and good to use causality to ascribe purpose to things. It gives you hope. However, quantum physics suggests that time can be modeled equally well going forwards as backwards(mathematically speaking), and to the more miniscule versions of physics, the notion of causality is meaningless.
To the high-and-mighty people saying the 4th dimension is time, that is a misinterpretation of dimensions. Any time you create an orthagonal projection accross other dimensions you create a new one. While space and time can be construed to be perpendicular, there's no inherent quality making time the 4th dimension.
ikanreed's recent comments: