flamingspinach's profile

December 24th, 2005
July 1st, 2012
Made Average Rating
44 1.00
Total Created Average Score
2 (2.70) 
Made Received
$0.00 $0.00

recent activity

when activity
July 1st, 2012 flamingspinach viewed ?Monsquaz's profile.
July 1st, 2012 flamingspinach viewed ?Monsquaz.
June 17th, 2012 flamingspinach viewed ?(nsfw) Shinji from Evangelion sticks it to GAINAX.
May 23rd, 2012 flamingspinach viewed ?Conan's Mirage.
May 23rd, 2012 flamingspinach viewed ?William fails at his day job's profile.

most recent sites

title views votes rating creation
?africa mexico sicily tijuana india osaka indonesia 5,281 16 (2.69)  2006-05-21
?OMG, Secret Nazi DDR Strategy !! 1,171 7 (2.71)  2006-03-30

highest rated sites

title views votes rating creation
?OMG, Secret Nazi DDR Strategy !! 1,171 7 (2.71)  2006-03-30
?africa mexico sicily tijuana india osaka indonesia 5,281 16 (2.69)  2006-05-21

recent comments

March 24th, 2009
In case anyone is wondering, source is http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x44lh2
January 18th, 2007
On on the site ?))D8
ps lol citruschild looks like some alien from star wars (with a really washed out palette :o)
January 18th, 2007
On on the site ?))D8
dis sh*t needs some labeling
January 18th, 2007
On on the site ?moogy
o
September 30th, 2006
I highly suggest you drop Aquinas's argument and stick with Godel's - http://www.stats.uwaterloo.ca/~cgsmall/ontology.html for details. I'm an atheist, but unlike most of the dumbasses around here, I actually am familiar with both this "proof" of God's existence and most others as well. Godel's ontological argument is the only one I've seen that's remotely convincing, and this is mainly because he clearly defines everything he is talking about, and makes clear what we are assuming. Check it out.