This site is cool and not pr0n. How's about a legal definition of pr0n for all you laymen out there: "images containing sexual acts, implication thereof, or sexual nudity." These girls aren't engaged in a sexual act, they aren't implying .sex, nor are they positioned in a sexual manner. Therefore it is simply nudity, not porn. And anyone who gets upset about something on the internet is just dumb. Don't you know the internet counts for sh*t? RL is where it's at, d00d.
djbookworm's recent comments: