But in any case, don't pretend that this is lowering the standards as far as originality goes. Maybe it's not up to the standard you WANT to create, but that's different. And if that is the case, then your standards are extremely unrealistic for this site. I think this meets any reasonable standard for adding content not found in the original work, unless you are asking every single person to draw their own art and compose their own music. If you don't like it then maybe you should build your own website.
This YTMND took a webcomic, turned it into a slideshow with decent cropping and good timing, and set it to well-chosen music. So: 5.
OmniIcyshelf makes taking things too seriously into a goddamned art form. Seriously, YTMND was born from a goofy soundbite of a movie. It had a picture of Sean Connery because Internet pages are supposed to have graphical representation. Maybe you can turn YTMND into some sort of paradise for original, intelligent, creative Internet art; I really, really, really doubt it.
Boondoggle: "a wasteful or impractical project or activity often involving graft" While the concept itself was solid, and certainly I'm not aware of graft or suchlike associated with the project, the fact remains that it was a huge money sink, the materials used were suboptimal to say the least, and -- most damningly -- airplane engines at the time were simply not up to the task of propelling such a gigantic plane through the air for any practical endeavor.
Mega Man 2 and 3 are tied for BEST MEGA MAN EVAR. This YTMND, though effectively hitting the "nostalgia" button, is not really that good. I'd give it 2 stars but you got downvoted by dabest so you get 3.
"Creepy" is the word that pops to most people's minds, but I don't think it's quite right. It's more like a disturbing knd of melancholy . . . but then again, I suppose anything that sends shivers down your spine could justifiably be called "creepy".
5 without a doubt. Thank you Duvessa for bringing this site to the front page.
is understandably sketchy. But come on. Upwards of 66 million? Probably upwards of 150 million, when adjusted for total number of people alive 1100-1250 or 1300? I don't think so. It does your cause no credit to use exaggerated statistics while denouncing exaggerated statistics.
Final‑Fan's recent comments: