....The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
The idea that life on Earth is too complex to have developed on its own without the aid of some external (and even *more* complex) alien life form (god) is just as silly as the crap scientologist believe. Just because that belief is older than scientology (and just because your parents believe it) doesn’t make it any less insane.
YTMND is full of creationists? You've got to be sh*ttin' me. The bible is a poorly written (and heavily plagerized) piece of Jewish mythology (http://forums.newspeakdictionary.com/post-11577.html#11577).
Actually, there is a strong possibility that he never existed at all. Some person *like* Jesus may have existed, but the character portrayed in the gospels is almost entirely myth. (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Myth)
Damn... I was hoping to fool everybody into thinking that I found an actual video of Elron's cremation ... and I would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling kids.
Scientologists don't believe he's dead... "There they were told that Hubbard 'willingly discarded the body after it was no longer useful to him,' and that this signified 'his ultimate success: the conquest of life that he embarked upon half a century ago.' Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that Hubbard's ultimate success lay in convincing millions of people he was something other than a nut." - http://www.slate.com/id/2122835?nav=ais
BigBrother's recent comments:
تسقط
القنابل
You drop bomb!