The disclaimer told you exactly what this YTMND was going to be about, yet you continued to watch it, then you complain about what the disclaimer warrned you about.
site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2
Site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2 for source but site 2 cites site 1 for source but site 1 cites site 2
Simple similar example -not the same- If I had a camera in two hallways, that met one point (like a V, with one hallway to the left, and one to the right) and I (not looking), threw a ball down into the hallways, it could go in the left or right hallway. If I don't look at the camera footage, it would have gone in both hallways (setting it in stone. Once the information is know, it's not something you can change). If I watch where the ball goes, it will go in A OR B, and never have the option to go in both.
What milky is TRYING to say is "Any sort of thinking beyond "What McDonald combo do I want today?" requires too much effort as it is. That's all. Milky isn't trying to insult you, just try to explain to the public at his/her preference to think less, and be controlled by our instincts more. It's not wrong, it's just different.
I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii I hope it's on the Wii
totalpwnage, 3 stars, -2 for running in the 90s... Doesn't sound like it at all :/. If it does
then its been slowed down by a lot.
.
.
That was the most worthless (and stupid) comments and reason to downvote ever.
You all owe me your souls. Here's the site: http://www.ssh.ne.jp/ http://www.ssh.ne.jp/ http://www.ssh.ne.jp/ http://www.ssh.ne.jp/ http://www.ssh.ne.jp/
deejaydean is a douchebag deejaydean is a douchebag deejaydean is a douchebag deejaydean is a douchebag deejaydean is a douchebag He only has 1 star YTMNDs and gives out 99% 1 star ratings LOLZ
John Lennon sounds different than I remember. John Lennon sounds different than I remember. John Lennon sounds different than I remember. John Lennon sounds different than I remember. John Lennon sounds different than I remember. John Lennon sounds different than I remember.
(1) Fix the Sync, the audio is a bit too long (or the vid is too short, your choice), and (2) I think it should be 'devolved' rather than evolved into Charmillionare. =P
Anifanatic's recent comments: