Add a comment

i voted 1 but then deleted it. that should be noted.

i remember when ytmnd-centric circle jerk trends seemed to [i[maybe[/i] be an issue. these sites often expressed overly meta statements about ytmnd without offering any real criticism. it was like, have a ytmnd reference in the title and post an image that was just silly and mocking. kind of like this site. exactly like this site.

then, the circle jerk tendency was picked up by specific users who created and used the "vote 5 obligation" to perpetuate their own inside joke motives, creating user groups who sought to control what content got onto the main page, whether they were aware of this or not. while they had god, friendly intentions, most were not aware of the damaging effects of their actions. even i am a bit of a guilty participant.

assuming youre a new user, yourdogisnowtheman (which i find hard to believe, no offence), it seems you're going through the new-user motions of learning what sort of content is well received and what causes eyes to roll back into skulls, acompanied by furious 1 star voting. i said before, while you show promise, much of your content seems to be incomplete draft assets, experimental "effects test" type of less-than-final products reflecting blase, detached effort that defeats the personal investment it takes to make the final products you can truly be proud of. many of your sites heavily rely on their titles to to explain what we're about to see. the thing is, the content of the site should show us what we need to know, not the title. titles are always the least important thing. the basic principle behind exposition; the exposing of essential information, showing it, not telling it in titles or text on screen. show us, don't tell us in the title. sorry if i seem to be on a high, critical, better-than-thou horse. i dont know you, so i cant assume youre like me, a coll