Hank walks in on a bad ad

Created on: May 29th, 2009

Hank walks in on a bad ad

• Report this site

Created By:

hathair

Domain:

hankwalksinonabadad.ytmnd.com

Description:

Charizard and Hathair make a site.

Foreground Origin:

Sound Origin:

Keywords:

lame

ad

box

fad

hank

walks

in

what

else

does

the

say

Sponsorships:

user	amount	user	amount
No one has sponsored this site ( ._.)
Sponsor this site!		Total: $0.00	Active: $0.00

Vote metrics:

rating	total votes	favorites	comments
(3.86)	49	1	50

View metrics:

today	yesterday	this week	this month	all time
0	0	0	0	4,717

Inbound links:

views	url
44	https://www.bing.com
6	http://www.google.com.hk
5	http://216.18.188.175:80
3	http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/
2	https://www.google.com/

Add a comment

Richtext is ON
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link

Please login or register to comment.

0 of 2000 characters used.

Notify me if anyone replies

May 29th, 2009

(3)

LOL, Gabbly.

May 29th, 2009

(3)

lol. Site Collaboration.

May 29th, 2009

(0)

was this one of Charizard's "great ideas" from the Gabbly think tank?

May 29th, 2009

(4)

maybe?

May 29th, 2009

(4)

stephens = assc*ck - a c*ck + a pussy

May 29th, 2009

(0)

Charizard = good ideas

May 29th, 2009

(0)

Charizard = poopy pants in a cup hehe

May 29th, 2009

(0)

hairizard = hairy pussy with big laybia lips that are a shockingly darker skin tone than pale skin tone of the girl. should have expected that, the her nipples were some Dark Brownerz�

May 29th, 2009

(0)

Dark Browner� Nipples� with Big Thumb Nipple Pokerz� to deepthroat

May 29th, 2009

(10)

your STILL HERE? you talk to us about destroying it? REALLY! go make another alt.

May 29th, 2009

(0)

damn. you really are a sad person stephen umfulds.

May 29th, 2009

(0)

i could care less what Charizard does with his alts. hes given me more 1s than he has 5s, and im sure he did that with alts too. who cares. a group of like 10 people is not destroying this place.

May 29th, 2009

(4)

Charizard used ember.

May 30th, 2009

12:59:52 AM CDT

(-1)

some f*cker minus'd this, f*cker.

May 29th, 2009

(4)

FAT BITCH�

May 29th, 2009

(0)

��

May 29th, 2009

(0)

��

May 30th, 2009

12:44:12 AM CDT

(0)

��_�----� _�___�-�-� _�___�-----�

May 29th, 2009

(0)

That AD annoys me. I would have said "the box also says your being a total f*cking bitch, shut your f*cking mouth and stop taking everything so personal. F*cking idiot."

May 29th, 2009

(-9)

[ comment (and 1 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]

(-9)

"Charizard and Hathair make a site." I can tell.

May 29th, 2009

(-2)

[ comment (and 26 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]

(-2)

Other Apparent Hathair Alts: Martinprince, aMagazineCalledWalking, lickitwellhiem, Charizard, Shadebrand, Brandon00151, meaty

May 29th, 2009

(-1)

dont forget niktrek1, garygnu, goneja, ochobobo, keatonkeaton999, fourest, assc*ckredux

May 29th, 2009

10:25:14 PM CDT

(0)

[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]

(0)

take a chill pill man.

May 29th, 2009

10:47:22 PM CDT

(0)

[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]

(0)

Well,sorry if I am not on ytmnd enough to know who alts are whose and who votes on their own sites and whatnot. I understand your concern (on a certain level), but not all of us can spend an eternity on ytmnd like you. All I am saying is hey: tone it down a notch. The fact that we can't "care" about ytmnd as much as you is really a statement of our priorities, and not an encouragement of improper voting behavior and etiquette. There is no incentive to be a ytmnd police officer. I come here to make sites.

May 29th, 2009

11:52:17 PM CDT

(0)

so stephens the invisible max say this sh*t so that no one would have to run the site because wed all agree not to have alts? we would all participate alone? hanktherapper is the only person you can think of because hes only person that f*cking dumb. we know you got the alts so why dont you man up and double or quadruple downvote us? is there a difference? you think you have some morals on a dead website? not to mention that you already circle jerk downvote so its already nuetral aye?

prairiedogeric10

May 30th, 2009

12:21:55 AM CDT

(3)

c-c-c-c-c-combo breaker

May 30th, 2009

12:28:10 AM CDT

(0)

Circle jerk list? More delusions. Try? You mean like waste my time checking spy all day? Why? It is not productive. The fact that you whine and moan and still nothing has risen to your standards, just proves that enforcing your policies does nothing, and either Max doesn't care what you think, or he is too lazy to do something about it. If he doesn't care, why should we? At any rate, do you know who's job it is to enforce ytmnd's policies? The moderators. And I always read your comments.

May 30th, 2009

12:29:16 AM CDT

(0)

Umfuld's argument progression: (1) downvote (2) post insulting comment (3) begin rant in which he accuses people (4) call people liars

May 30th, 2009

12:30:17 AM CDT

(0)

LIAR

May 30th, 2009

12:44:16 AM CDT

(0)

F.Y.I. I have a hard to time believing everything you say regarding alt abuse, considering you are prime abuser of alts yourself (That which has been well documented and commented about by MANY users). Why should I be so inclined to consider your word before the world's? You can only name hank because (like you), he tries too hard when there is nothing to gain from it; the defining difference, being that he doesn't accuse everyone of upvoting, or alt abuse. (Yes, even me).

May 30th, 2009

12:47:06 AM CDT

(0)

Actually, Umfuld falls into so many traps, its really sad. He overreacts, turns everyone against him, and he also participates in many of the actions that he condemns. Maybe he would have an ounce of a case if he wasn't such a hypocrite.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

I thought I was steakmans alt?

May 30th, 2009

(0)

[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]

(0)

But, you aren't right. Partaking in the features of this site (voting, making sites) is different than policing this site (telling others what to do). The users shouldn't be solely responsible for what happens to this site. There is a reason why we don't have a lot of privileges. We can't give every user like suspending other users, or tracking every single stat, otherwise it would be total chaos. Users can be unpredictable. The more options you give, the more possibilities of abuse. That's why we have mods

May 30th, 2009

(0)

but we dont have mods, we have umfuld.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]

(0)

And another thing, you can't dictate what everyone else thinks is funny, and just because you don't think something is funny or good it doesn't mean the views or votes were attained through dishonest or improper means. You are basically trying to undermine the very democratic system that this site is built upon in order to further your self-righteous agenda of being the "protector" of ytmnd.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]

(0)

Well I think there is a couple but no one knows where they are LOL

May 30th, 2009

(0)

well im only judging the amount of work our mods do based on the amount work "max" (supposedly) does.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

I already told you: I don't BELIEVE YOUR CLAIM. For an assertion to be correct, you must PROVE IT. And I also said I understood your original sentiment, so I was not trying to shut you up on the grounds that I was defending alt abuse. I was only trying to calm you down, because I know how you get, but once again, you refuse to have a non-hostile conversation. It is just so much easier to have a debate without distractions like insults, and emotional filler.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

oh wrong account (I use ot for my really bad sites).

May 30th, 2009

(0)

umfuld this is the point where people see you rear your ugly head and say who is that ugly f*cker? as where i know someone like assc*ck you still seem like a total dumbass. wisdumcube - he protects nothing. he has nothing to contribute or add to. if you want to downvote everything for a laugh be my guest but you dont even have comments worth reading to the average user.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

Of course he has nothing to protect, and he is more transparent than a glass window, but arguing with him is just too much fun. I guess I will stop so your comment page doesn't get too long.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

This is my only other account. I use it to vote on art sites that are underappreciated (that barely fall of up and coming). That's not upvoting (I don't do favors, and I don't have a list.) I've also accidentally voted on a couple of other stuff, like I accidentally commented here. If I wasn't interested in maintaining the focus of the argument (i.e. giving you false hope with ammo),I would have revealed it to you sooner, further proving my point that you take ytmnd too seriously. Have fun.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

I must admit that I am a little disappointed. This means the account will lose anonymity and I'll have to make a new one so I can escape my main account to make bad sites. I'm going to do an experiment now: if you can get max to delete it, you win teh ytmnd game, and max cares and that means he's willing to enforce the rules of ytmnd. If not, well what have you been fighting for? It wasn't originally a voting alt, but I started trying to be a selfless crusader. A dark knight. Let's see what happens.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

Did I vote on one of sinistar's sites with it? Oh well, that was unintentional. When I first made the account I was really careful, but then I slipped up a few times, but no one keeps track and the slip ups were so minuscule that I didn't bother to comb through the votes and delete them. If it would make you happy I could delete it but then again, I don't really care. Notice that I also voted on entirely unknown sites with unknown users. It's a coincidence. Once again, you read into everything too much.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

You are welcome, I hope this got you more enjoyment than scouring spy. Btw, I never denied that I had an alt. I only denied voting on sites for the sake of favors (circle jerking). You are still delusional because even if I was circle jerking and not boosting art sites to up and coming, my higher rated sites would still fall off up and coming, but they don't. Also only 4 people knew it was my alt before now. It was an experiment more than anything.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

You are getting an erection out of this? Wow. Though I do admit that this will be a great thread to look back on, for one reason or another, I don't think this will be the crowning achievement of my ytmnd hypocrisy. More than anything, this is just a food scrap that you hungrily overreact to because you were going off of speculation for so many accusations (still 99% untrue), and finally all of your complaining and desperate attempts at refutation gave you something back. I'm still a selfless ytmnder.

May 30th, 2009

(0)

Im shadebrand's alt.

prairiedogeric10

May 30th, 2009

12:20:19 AM CDT

(0)

nice site

May 30th, 2009

12:57:12 AM CDT

(-1)

I don't really get it, but it's not like it matters since it's another one of those f*cking "Hank" sites, so it's automatically sh*t...