Typical Star Trek Technobabble
Created on: December 2nd, 2008
Typical Star Trek Technobabble
This sucks, one star.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.99) 137 10 52

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 1 0 0 8,819

Inbound links:

views url
40 https://www.bing.com
9 http://www.google.com.hk
3 http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/
3 https://www.google.com/
2 http://216.18.188.175:80

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
December 2nd, 2008
(7)
Until last week, I'd never seen a single episode of the original Star Trek series in my life. But now with Netflix on X-Box I've been watching the first season. It's easily the most inconsistent show I've ever seen, one episode will be an amazingly intellectual meditation on the futility of war, and the next episode will be about Kirk and a monster hitting each other over the head with rocks. Anyway here's this.
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
That's TV in general... smart people can't write every show....
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
Wait till you get to the one when aliens steal Spock's brain
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
Hey now.
December 2nd, 2008
(-2)
Yeah, TNG is better than any other Trek series... but thanks for letting me know this is on Watch Instantly! I went back and checked, and now Twilight Zone AND the Super Mario Brothers Super Show is on Watch Instantly! (I've already watched the Zelda show)
December 4th, 2008
(0)
I've been watching them on x-box myself, i agree with your assessment
December 4th, 2008
(0)
That's the trouble with Tribbles..... Which is actually a fictional case study of how the introduction of a foreign species to the environment can lead to the destruction of the ecosystem, such as rabbits in Australia.
(0)
What you call inconsistency, I call variety.
December 2nd, 2008
(-1)
I've never been able to get into the original Star Trek either. I loved TNG when it was on, but when I watch episodes now, I realize how stupid they are. I've never cared for the other Star Treks shows or movies (with apologies to Money-Hat).
December 2nd, 2008
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
The new movie looks like ten kinds of awesome though. I bet the Trekkies will hate it.
December 2nd, 2008
(2)
It looks like ten kinds of crap. Gene Roddenberry must be rolling over in his grave. YEAH MAN PUMP UP THE ACTION AND SEX, THAT WILL MAKE PEOPLE LIKE STAR TREK, THATS WHAT STAR TREK IS ABOUT.
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
^Are you sh*tting me? Have you seen The Final Frontier? Star Trek may have been Rodenberry's baby, but he abused it beyond recognition. Thank god Rick Berman adopted and nurtured it back to health.
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
BERMAN ?! BERMAN !? Have you seen Insurrection and Nemesis. Or voyager. Or enterprise. Berman adopted it and kept it locked in the basement, beating on it when it would perform until it lost all will to live. And that bastard Brannon watched.
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
I haven't seen Nemesis. TNG was f*cking excellent, DS9 was decent, and Voyager... yeah, Voyager sucked. That still leaves Berman with a better batting average than Roddenberry.
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
Roddenberry has the original series and movies take that or leave it but you cant say that star trek 2 3 4 and 6 are somehow worse then Insurrection and Nemesis. and TOS and TNG > Berman in everyway possible.
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
Final Frontier is NOT something you can blame on Roddenberry. That was all William Shatner.
December 3rd, 2008
(1)
Hey, I was right. Trekkies hate action and sex.
December 4th, 2008
(2)
lol nerd arguments
December 5th, 2008
(0)
^It was more of an impassioned discussion than an argument.
December 2nd, 2008
(1)
Jesus, it could be anything.
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
fad time! :D
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
[ comment (and 3 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
More Star Trek sites, less Star Wars sites please.
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
This makes me want to finish all those Andromeda sites I started. Ha
December 2nd, 2008
(2)
Dramatic situation report
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
extreme range
December 2nd, 2008
(1)
MELVAR!
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
Welshie!!!!!!!!!!
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
2'd because I want to see what they see... tease
December 2nd, 2008
(3)
what does that even mean? i hate when these shows get so full of themselves with their Sci-Fi mumbo jumbo.
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
there's something on the f*cking screen f*cking far away
December 2nd, 2008
(1)
ITS GUTSMAN! DAH DUHN!
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
By the looks on their faces I'd say they're looking through some sort of temporal rift into the future and getting a glimps of Sulu's honeymoon.
December 2nd, 2008
(0)
whatever it is, Scotty sure doesn't like the look of it.
December 2nd, 2008
(1)
Balance of Terror indeed
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
USS MakeSh*tUp
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
He gets an extra four quads per channel!
December 3rd, 2008
(2)
Something visual ahead captain, an extremely sh*tty ytmnd
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
Add the text he is saying to the page for a 5.
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
I've been around long enough to know when text is warranted and when it isn't.
December 3rd, 2008
(0)
Your loss.....
December 3rd, 2008
(2)
At extreme range.
December 3rd, 2008
(-1)
I guess I missed what was good about this.
December 5th, 2008
(2)
good guess
December 4th, 2008
(0)
6
December 4th, 2008
(0)
Next part of this scene is: "Thats no moon, it's a"
December 4th, 2008
(0)
Gay.
December 5th, 2008
(1)
XXXTREME RANGE
December 6th, 2008
(0)
English Sulu!!!
November 9th, 2010
(1)
NORMAL VIEW