SHIT Bear Attacks High Rated Sites
Created on: May 18th, 2008
SHIT Bear Attacks High Rated Sites
SH*T

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.86) 69 1 35

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
2 0 0 0 3,480

Inbound links:

views url
53 https://www.bing.com
5 https://google.com
5 http://www.google.com.hk
4 http://216.18.188.175:80
1 http://www.google.com

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
May 18th, 2008
(7)
cmon, you should know by now this sort of thing is counterproductive
May 18th, 2008
(-9)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-9)
what would be productive?
May 18th, 2008
(20)
wrapping your mouth around exposed electrical wires
May 18th, 2008
(6)
^ Best comment i've seen in a few dayes
May 19th, 2008
(0)
jerking off with Icy-hot would be more productive
(1)
the sh*t bear is a prodigious creative leap
May 18th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
at least someone shares my vision.
May 18th, 2008
(-1)
Deerhunter is asian, and like all asians, he's into sh*t
May 18th, 2008
(2)
So, if recent high-rated sites have been sh*t, and this site itself is sh*t but rated poorly, would it follow that your sh*t is much sh*ttier?
May 18th, 2008
(-3)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-3)
id hope so.
May 18th, 2008
(2)
SH*TTIER SH*T FTW
May 18th, 2008
(1)
Actually, good sites have been getting the ratings they deserve more often now. You're just a mainstreamf*g with horrible crappy DVD-rip stupid joke taste that everyone hates and you forgot to eat a bowl of poland you carry
May 18th, 2008
(2)
what you just said is bullsh*t. i may have never really made a site that is in your taste, but my taste in sites varies far beyond dvd-rip edits. what i think is ridiculous to see is sites that arent up to par with the old Top Rated being placed up there. as far as ratings go, it used to be brutal to even get a site on the up and coming, but now the up and coming is filled with sh*t that wouldnt have even been a 'worthwhile ytmnd'.
May 18th, 2008
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
p.s. your dennis bergkamp site was depressing. it lacked the usual Darthwang touch.
May 18th, 2008
(5)
Hey, you can't please everyone
May 18th, 2008
(-4)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-4)
DarthWang: He's like MurdarMachene minus the funny
May 18th, 2008
(5)
F*CKING THING SUCKS
May 18th, 2008
(0)
F*CK IT, WE'LL DO IT LIVE!
May 18th, 2008
(2)
NO I'LL WRITE IT AND WE'LL DO IT LIVE!
May 18th, 2008
(0)
5 for sh*t bear
May 18th, 2008
(0)
f*ckfish
May 18th, 2008
(-3)
SH*T BEAR IS NOW AMUSED!
May 18th, 2008
(4)
does a sh*t bear sh*t in the woods?
May 18th, 2008
(0)
Oh, sh*t. Bear.
May 18th, 2008
(0)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(0)
featured abuser
May 18th, 2008
(1)
uh wut
May 18th, 2008
(0)
At least your sites are safe then, bobby-guapo!
May 18th, 2008
(1)
clan of the cave sh*t bear
May 18th, 2008
(2)
It's no f*ck fish.
May 19th, 2008
(-1)
Sh*t bear, also called "brown bears" when they live near the coast, are wild creatures. But seasonal feeding patterns make it possible for relatively predictable viewing possibilities. Particularly in regard to coastal sh*t bears, which depend on the annual f*ck fish runs as a mainstay for their diets.
May 19th, 2008
(0)
change your name, stop molesting bears, and you just might be ok... for a while...
May 18th, 2008
(-3)
4 but only for the choice of music.
May 18th, 2008
(0)
sh*t
May 19th, 2008
(-1)
Remember, they're more afraid of jews than you are afraid of them!
May 19th, 2008
(0)
This would only be appropriate if this was a grizzly bear. Black bears are known to be non-aggressive and will only maul when threatened by nazis. Also, when bald eagles are eating their young.