SNAPE DIES killing Voldemort so Harry can live
Created on: June 9th, 2007
Snape dies killing Voldemort to save Harry's life in Harry Potter book 7. Oh and the last horcrux is in Sirius' house.
Warning: this description contains spoilers for Harry Potter book 7, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| SocialDemocracy | $60.00 | spartanfornow | $8.44 |
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $68.44 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.15) | 552 | 11 | 281 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 98,437 |
Inbound links:
Let's just number a few of the obvious failings in this fake:
1. 'You came through in the end' is pure Americanism.
2. So is 'you saw how Severus went down'.
3. 'quickly looked at both sides' - sh*t English. Should be looked TO both sides.
4. 'someone who doesn't care wouldn't have faced up' - sh*t grammar. Should be 'someone who DIDN'T care wouldn't have faced up'.
5. 'It's weird but' - more Americanisms.
6. 'I never listened to him or I never' - utterly sh*t English. Should be 'I never listened to him, and I never' or 'I never... nor did I'.
7. 'turned to pay his full attention' - nuh-uh. More crap English. You don't 'pay your full attention'. You give it.
8. 'better than we give him credit for, that's why...' For f*ck's sake. Did you hire a child to do this? There should be a full stop (a period to you Americans) after 'for', and 'that' should start with a capital T. Oh, and it should be 'gave' rather than 'give'.
In summary:
FAIL.
Well considering JK Rowling (or whatever her name is) was homeless before she wrote the books, I think she may have bad grammar :p Also, this could be a manuscript scan in which case you could still have grammatical errors because it is still an unfinished copy. Not to mention most of the quotes you provided are dialog which doesn't have to be grammatically correct. I'm not saying its real, but if it is I want you to suck my american c*ck
Most people that don't read HP would not catch the misspellings, ergo I laid it out, plain and simple, why this page is a fake.
Remonster: Do you honestly think that someone that's typing up a manuscript in Word is going to bypass all the inherent squiggly red lines all over the page? I don't think so.
Gangstud, you moron. He referred to Americanisms first than complained about "sh*t Grammar/utterly sh*t English/Crap English ". The insult is implied. That's like insulting "Black" people if he said Nizzle is "Ebonics" then later saying What the Dilly, Yo is a sh*t greeting, N*gga Please is sh*t English, and B*tches ain't Sh*t is more crap English. Gex made good observations about the invalidity of the picture BUT insulted Americans. Not saying our English is emmaculate but (Brains)*0=You
I'm gonna laugh when this is fake. However, everyone saying "OMG SHE SAYS NO NEW CHARACTERS WILL BE INTRODUCED"--I highly doubt there won't be some minor new character somewhere, and no one said this Rimulus guy is a major player in the book. Nevertheless, this excerpt is pretty failtastic and doesn't have the effect Snape Kills Dumbledore had.
The real flaw with this one is that even if it were real, half the fanbase expects Snape to turn good anyway, so it just doesn't have the same impact. What made SKD so awesome was that a guy could drive around a bookstore shouting it, and that lady was actually upset by what he said. If he shouted this she'd be all "Yeah, so?"
The last couple of Harry Potter books have sucked worse than hell. They were made to be made into movies. They suck so badly. I was, no kidding, expecting something like 'Snape kills Voldemort' to happen, because that's such a lowly uninteresting predictable thing that is going to happen... in a low-grade hollywood movie.
hey, i used to read them. Then i realized that real books were better for you. I have a list of them here for you: 1984, Animal Farm, Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?, The Man In The High Castle, A Scanner Darkly, Keep The Aspidistra Flying, A Lesson Before Dying, To Kill A Mockingbird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, The Kite Runner, Thank You For Smoking, and Boomsday. Read any combination of any of these books, and then tell me whether you still like Harry Potter.
Geo, that comment was complete bullsh*t. I have read nearly every book you listed, and that still doesn't take anything away from Harry Potter. Face it, it's a good story. It's not a thinking man's series of books though, that's for sure. Also, Alchemy is complete bullsh*t and it has been regarded as such in America for about 200 years. It's no coincidence that a lot of people may not know what the Philosopher's Stone is. So, suck my ignorant American c*ck.
This is from the blog, and I think they have a point:
This is so fake. That's not J.K Rowlings style. She more detailed. THere are misspellings. And none of the things written in there are exactly revelations. These theories have been long thought of. I mean, c'mon. "Scans" of Harry Potter books have leaked before and all of em have been fake. Pretty sure the final book is under freaking GUARD. It's a multi-million dollar book, after all.
NOOOOOOOOO YOU BITCH< YOU RUINED THE F*CKING THING FOR ME, WHY DID YOU DO THAT?? WHY DID YOU SPEND 60 $ JUST SO YOU CAN RUIN IT FOR ME.. @#@%%@#@#E I HATE YOU, LET KING LEO KICK YOU IN THE PIT AND WHILE YOUR FALLING /wrist SO THERE WOULD BE ONE LESS HARRY POTTER SPOILER MAKER IN REAL LIFE. nah just kiddin it was alright, i dont care. the fact that you paid 60$ was halarious. i hope it was worth it for you
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link