An Underrated Site
Created on: March 13th, 2007
i wish i could view/present ytmnds this way
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.77) | 79 | 1 | 28 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3,654 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 51 | https://www.bing.com |
| 5 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 5 | http://www.google.com.hk |
| 2 | https://www.google.com/ |
| 1 | http://www.google.com |
Underrated sites are underrated, by definition. Yet, this site about underrated sites seems to be overrated. Is that because people are making amends for their previous poor voting choices on underrated sites or because they agree with this sentiment yet refuse to go and find such sites and correct the mistake? I fear that if I vote it will spark a paradoxical black hole that will spew high ratings to all the sites that I never want to see, so I abstain.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link