Add a comment

me love you long time

Oh sh*t, you got me Glamiss.

I have proof. By the way, beast404 is sending a good message across. These don't belong on here. *I am a Christian*

I thank you. I'm a Christian, and proud of it. But I respect the beliefs of other people. And I don't even wanna see this preachy stuff all over.

I can see your YTMND turning into a discussion board, because everyone on here has a good opinion with the exceptions of the obvious.

Even though I'm a believer, I really hate all the Religion/Anti-Religion based YTMNDs that are being created. Don't question my faith and don't make other people question yours. We're all on YTMND to enjoy it, not to discuss a never ending argument. A four for you.

...your fingers are doing WHAT to cold? But seriously, your ytmnd makes me fairly happy. I dont' come here for religious debate.

+1 for c*cks.

w00t! ATHEISTS AND AGNOSTICS FOR STFU!!!

Just for the record: Agnosticism ≠ Atheism.

Weak atheism is not a belief, and is not anywhere near the same as strong atheism, the belief that god does not exist. Weak atheism is not a belief but in fact a lack of belief due to a lack of rational evidence. Weak atheism is the rational default for the position you were advocating unless you somehow have rational proof that it is impossible to prove the existence of god, which is highly unlikely. Although, since religious zealots don't know anything, weak atheism is often confused with agnosticism.

Uh, Korf, you just basically said they're the same thing.

Alright Korf, watch this YTMND again, and reread what you said. People here are making ytmnds saying "GOD (doesnt) EXIST FOR THESE REASONS,) whereas most of it is speculation and rationalization without facts. What this YTMND was stating was that "If you don't have any concrete proof for either, then there's no way that you're going to prove it, and should therefore, shut the hell up." Atheism advocates that "God doesnt exist, period," What this ytmnd is advocating is that we can't prove it either way.

Moreover, you define weak atheism as "a lack of belief due to a lack of rational evidence." Didn't you say in your little excerpt from wikipedia that "Some agnostics take a stronger view that the concept of a deity is incoherent, thus meaningless and irrelevant to life." Now, if the concept of a diety is incoherent, wouldn't agnostics have "a lack of belief due to a lack of rational evidence?" Way to make yourself sound like an idiot.

Hmm, agnosticism is a claim to knowledge, and atheism literally means A (without) theism (god belief). Agnostic is (A) without (knowledge) about X. So yeah, agnostic is more of a helper term.