Ghandi Fails at Philosophy
Created on: September 13th, 2006
Momentary? Looks like Mr. Ghandi was a little off on that one...
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (2.61) | 28 | 0 | 24 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,930 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 2 | https://www.google.com/ |
| 1 | https://www.google.com/'<?=print(9347655345-4954366 |
Gandhi's ideas worked against England because the English were not willing to commit mass murder to continue subjugating the Indian people. They would not have worked against the Nazis or WWII-era Japanese, because those nations were willing to kill anyone and everyone in order to win. The same goes for today's enemy: terrorists and terror-supporting nations.
Ghandi's ideas worked where he lived, though I disagree with them universally. Pacifism at some times is a moral position, but at other times it can be an immoral one. showing the world the face of the enemy by allowing them to run over you, is in some level stupid, but it can and clearly did - work. Gandhi defeated the British in India without firing a shot. If Tibetan monks were suicide bombing the Chinese would they still have the sympathy they do? i highly doubt it.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link