That is assuming that our definition is correct in the beginning, how can our definition of a perfect god be true if there is no god? therefore god doesnt exist or at least our definition of him is wrong so you are therefore wrong

Digdugz

September 9th, 2006

1:53:10 PM CDT

(0)

If god didn't exist, she wouldn't be "imperfect". She wouldn't "be" at all.

humvee2800

September 9th, 2006

1:54:12 PM CDT

(0)

Trying to use circular logic doesnt usually work

manura

September 9th, 2006

1:54:32 PM CDT

(0)

sh*t

paphan

September 9th, 2006

1:55:00 PM CDT

(0)

Your argument is based on the belief that existence constitutes perfection. Does the definition of perfection necessarily include existence?

Dustino66

September 9th, 2006

2:01:07 PM CDT

(0)

u f*cking f*ggot, god dose not **ist. plz dont be a religious idiot and dont post your stories of the bible on the internet, let alone YTMND. quit ruining YTMNDs reputation with magical farytales of gods existance.

falstaff

September 9th, 2006

2:02:51 PM CDT

(0)

Hokay, this didn't seem to catch when I wrote it in the description, so here it is again. I DO NOT ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS. I think it is FUNNY. Once again, NOT MY ACTUAL OPINION. Thank you.

falstaff

September 9th, 2006

2:05:40 PM CDT

(0)

And incidentally, if my fellow atheists don't learn to f*cking spell, I may well get religion just for spite. Seriously, take a moment and actually THINK; if you can't even recognize sarcasm in a YTMND labelled 'epic,' you're worse than the fundies.

BlackWolf4830

September 9th, 2006

3:19:10 PM CDT

(0)

I'll just give you a five because I think you don't deserve all of the sh*t you're getting. I really don't get the joke, but it's alright. Seriously people, calm the uckfay down.

Baron

September 9th, 2006

3:55:18 PM CDT

(0)

Arguemnt valid but not cogent.