Simon & Garfunkel get Hassan'd
Created on: August 31st, 2006
Simon and Garfunkel get their concert interrupted by a certain disgruntled former member of the WWE... and shows them how unoriginal he thinks they are!
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.23) | 22 | 1 | 6 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4,331 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 43 | https://www.bing.com |
| 10 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 7 | http://www.google.com.hk |
| 2 | https://www.google.com/ |
| 1 | https://www.google.com.br |
To answer your question - people are a lot more generous with their votes now (probably too generous). A site submitted today has a strong chance of being at least 2.5 as long as it isn't complete sh*t, and something even moderately good is usually put in the 3.5 - 4.0 range. Less than a year ago, it was almost unheard of to see a site averaging a 4.5 (I have a site with almost half a million views, but is only around 4.1...if I submitted a site that got half a million views NOW it would likely be right...
...around the 4.5 mark "just because"). Now you have a large group of sites in the 4.5 range and beyond. This has less to do with actual site quality than it does people being afraid to downvote (or a lot of the newer users just having low standards). That said, this is pretty well done, and it's nice to see a new Hassan.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link