Bush Admits it  
Created on: August 22nd, 2006
 
  Bush admits Iraq wasn't involved on 9-11
    Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount | 
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments | 
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.76) | 157 | 6 | 63 | 
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5,217 | 
Inbound links:
| views | url | 
|---|---|
| 50 | https://www.bing.com | 
| 9 | http://www.google.com.hk | 
| 2 | http://216.18.188.175:80 | 
| 1 | https://www.google.com/ | 
| 1 | http://www.google.com | 
   
   "No one ever said Iraq was behind 9/11." What are you f*cking retarded? When one asks "Why did we invade Iraq" and the administration replies "Because we were attacked on 9/11", that is a claim that they were connected. Simply because they never used the line "Saddam attacked us on 9/11" doesn't mean that they didn't claim he had a hand in it.  
    
   
   What should be obvious more than anything is that its clear by how long they avoided saying this line that to get what they wanted it was obvious they WANTED people to make the connection even if it didnt exist.  This Clintonesque parsing of language doesnt work for me any more now than it did with any other president.  
    
   
   and since i doubt many will click the link i gave, heres the important part: "Saddam Hussein and people like him were very much involved in 9/11," Rep. Robin Hayes said.
Told no investigation had ever found evidence to link Saddam and 9/11, Hayes responded, "I'm sorry, but you must have looked in the wrong places." Hayes, the vice chairman of the House subcommittee on terrorism, said legislators have access to evidence others do not. - others disagreed, but that direct connection DID get made...  
    
   
   "But you shouldnt ignore the fact that a great deal of Americans believed Iraq was involved, was one of many points of support for war, that Iraq was part of the 9/11 revenge..." I support the war, but I was not one of those americans. Iraq had nothing to do with revenge for 9/11. So what if Bush says Iraq was not responsible for 9/11? Nobody I knew ever thought it was.  
    
   
   The hilarious thing is that it is now all the rage to take statements made by this administration in previous years, and deny them as silly. Somehow some people (like the downvoters here) are gullible enough to erase their memory of past statements and accept the new ones as if they were always the administration's arguments.  
    
   
   "We invaded them because they rejected UN inspectors for their nuclear
program, it had nothing to do with terrorist attacks, hence why he says so" - the inspectors were in and they had Iraq actually dismantling the AlSamoud2 missles they actually DID have. saying they were rejecting the inspectors left and right is bullsh*t.  
    
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link