RIAA Lost For Once
Created on: July 14th, 2006
RIAA sucks Balls! And btw, don't downvote because of spelling, it's a lame excuse.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.94) | 287 | 1 | 64 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9,735 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 46 | https://www.bing.com |
| 6 | http://www.google.com.hk |
| 4 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 1 | http://www.google.com |
| 1 | https://google.com |
The article's final paragraph is worth quoting here: "The RIAA opposed the motion because it makes it more costly to back out of cases where there is a shortage of evidence to get to court. So far the RIAA has taken dead people and grandmothers to court on the basis of its technical evidence. If a few more fought back, its attempts to lean on people to settle out of court before a trail might prove a bit costly."
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link