lol 9.8 m/s/s (lol sig figs)
Created on: June 24th, 2006
lol 9.8 m/s/s (lol sig figs)
None ( ._.)

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.98) 623 15 160

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 1 0 0 26,640

Inbound links:

views url
42 https://www.bing.com
4 http://216.18.188.175:80
4 http://forum.kaasplateau.com/index.php?/topic/2549-saturday-morn
1 http://www.google.com
1 http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/water-cooler/16878-ytmnd-favorites-collected-links.html

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
el oh ell!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
nice
June 24th, 2006
(0)
wow, ingenious.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
BRILLIANT
June 24th, 2006
(0)
i thought it was 9.81 m/s/s?
June 24th, 2006
(0)
omg wat is that song, i hear it everywhere
June 24th, 2006
(0)
5'd for newton, physics and great justice!
(0)
isnt it 9.81 m/s/s?
June 24th, 2006
(0)
9.806 m/s^2
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Clever.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
It's the sudden stop that's the bugger.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Awesome. And a great title for it, as well. Fav'd and 5'd for scientific value...Ronald musta been fallin a LONG time for him to be goin that fast! lol
June 24th, 2006
(0)
i can't wait for somone to run in and go "IT'S 9.8 M/S^2 DUMBASS, NOT 9.8 M/S/S!!!"
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Damn had that idea but i have no skill whatsoever LOL 9.8 Meters Per Second Per Second SCIENCE FTW!!!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
grrrreat
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Lol'd on the inside. Great music, though. :D
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Where's the creativity, people? Obviously not with jeremyspoken22.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Shouldn't that be m/ss? Because m/s/s = m
June 24th, 2006
(0)
4d for being relatively intellectual
June 24th, 2006
(0)
yea. 9.81 m/s^2 nub
(0)
No, TheGmaster, you obviously dont know what you're talking about. Death to you for filling our heads with idiocy.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
If you've taken any physics in your entire life, you'd know that no one uses 9.81 as an approximation on tests. In fact, most professors tell you to use 10.0.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
sig figs can go stab themselves
June 24th, 2006
(0)
By m/ss, I meant m/s^2.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Haha that's great...and you are all the newbs... m/s/s= m/s^2...get a damn calculator if you don't belive me.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
SUCKS
June 24th, 2006
(0)
This would be funny if the background made sense.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
June 24th, 2006
(0)
gg
June 24th, 2006
(0)
The 9.8 only applies on earth, does it not?
June 24th, 2006
(0)
physics ftw also cocks
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Saw this one coming. And gravity varies from place to place anyway.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
5d for knowing what sig figs are!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
it only applies to earth, on the ground, and other objects with the mass and R of earth.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Free fall calculated acceleration of gravity FTW! Engineering Physics! FTW!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Eh, it's just not funny to me. Dead fad, no creativity.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
This is... BRILLIANT!!!1 YOU WIN SIR, WAY TO GO!!! LOL!!!!!!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
To those who are saying 9.81: g varies depending on altitude. 0.01 is insignificant.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
4 for /s/s vs /s^2
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol, physics
June 24th, 2006
(0)
32 ft/s/s
June 24th, 2006
(0)
wtf is this? nerd humour?
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Only in a VACUUM, sir, as otherwise you have the resistive force of air resistance that increases with the square of speed. (lol college physics j/k 5)
June 24th, 2006
(0)
5'd for that dang physics class
June 24th, 2006
(0)
5 because youre all nerds =) but then again so am i
June 24th, 2006
(0)
4 for good, +1 for inspiring debate on physics. for the record, 9.8 is close enough at the earth's surface, and it's always true, regardless of air resistance (which would reduce the net acceleration, but gravity still pulls ronald to acc. at 9.8 m/s^2). bah, i'll shut up before i say something wrong =\ - let's hope i haven't already.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
this is brilliant
June 24th, 2006
(0)
4 stars plus 1 star bonus for sig fig humor, lol!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Kind of surprising this wasn't done sooner
(0)
32.174ft/s^2 FTL
June 24th, 2006
(0)
:D
June 24th, 2006
(0)
i have physics exam on tuesday
June 24th, 2006
(0)
yay for the physics
June 24th, 2006
(0)
nice, but sound doesnt loop right, will5 when it does
June 24th, 2006
(0)
The text needs to move with the bubble and stay in place. fix for 5
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Science!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Actually, m/s/s would be ms/s or just m. You're looking for m/s^2, my friend.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
You people are retarded. M/s/s is the same f*cking thing as m/s^2 It's ACCELERATION:9.8 Meters per second per second. v-u / t = acceleration, where v is final velocity (m/s) and u is initial velocity (m/s) and t is time (s) put it all together and you get m/s over s hence m/s/s. Read a textbook.
(0)
Dystopian said it best: science!!! I can write science as an ambigram, so you can read it upside down or right-side up. Hooray! I also had a McDonalds double cheeseburger $1 menu item today. gross.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
The text doesn't move with the box, all you did was rotate it, gave it a different title. No thanks.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
requesting "lol, centrifugal motion"
June 24th, 2006
(0)
very original and correct formula
June 24th, 2006
(0)
"So that huge clown weighs only 1 kg? :) It's 9.8*m m/s^2" that'd be the force, this is just acceleration
June 24th, 2006
(0)
"^But the speed depends on the mass right?" nope, mass is irrelevent to speed in freefall (assuming we're ignoring air resistance and such)
June 24th, 2006
(0)
"But the speed depends on the mass right?" Newton's second law says F = ma, and the force of gravity near the surface of the earth says F = mg, so equating the two gives ma = mg, which gives a = g. Mass is irrelevant in a vacuum.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
"So he can live without air? Awesome :P" He's Ronald McDonald, he can do what he feels like. Although I believe it doesn't even matter with air resistance. What matters then is the area perpendicular to motion. ...Also I can't believe I'm having this discussion on YTMND.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol, physics
June 24th, 2006
(0)
98072481271968/1375 furlongs/fortnight^2
June 24th, 2006
(0)
9.8 ms^-2 is a good approximation since gravity varies depending on which point of the Earth's surface you're at (it could be 9.80, 9.81 or 9.82).
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol, why won't YTMND save it when I try to rate you with 5 starts?
June 24th, 2006
(0)
PTKFGS Anti-Gravity?
June 24th, 2006
(0)
1) Arojust... professors never tell you to use 10.0 except in mental approximations. 2)Funkwich, you're close. Gravity will pull Ronald to his terminal velocity, but try dropping a rock and a feather. They only fall together in a vacuum. 3) Gravity on Earth's surface is 9.80665, which is typically rounded to 9.807.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
And that "Earth's surface" claim is based on either the average distance of the earth's surface from it's core, or just sea level at the equator. Since the Earth's rotation kind of flattens it, it varies with latitude.
(0)
YAY PHYSICS!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
And to the guy who said "0.01 is insignificant."... I called 0.01. He says "No, you're insignificant!"
June 24th, 2006
(0)
m/s/s = m x s / s = m meters do not equal meters per second squared -1 for incorrect dimensional analysis
June 24th, 2006
(0)
if you dont find mine funny, you'd probably like this one http://lolantigravity.ytmnd.com/
June 24th, 2006
(0)
5 just because you didn't use "m/s^2" (The SAT had a question where they mentioned that acceleration due to gravity was 10 m/s. No science on that test)
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Didn't lol. Did laugh.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
ingenious!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
+5 for physics
June 24th, 2006
(0)
I hate sig figs.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Fgrav=G(M1xM2)/r^2 4ed.
(0)
HAHA
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Oh, I get it, you took the force of gravity and- ah, brilliant.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Physics ftw.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Retarded. 1
(0)
" sig figs can go stab themselves " QFT
June 24th, 2006
(0)
For science!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
LOL, forgetting that Ronald would be dead with 9.8 m/s^2 due to gravity as that means no air resistance so he'd have suffocated.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
June 24th, 2006
(0)
ok guys... m/s/s = (m/s)/(s/1)... it follows that m/s/s = (m/s)*(1/s) therefore, m/s/s = m/s^2 stfu all you tards and do some math
June 24th, 2006
(0)
ps.. nice ytmnd... go physics
(0)
nifty
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol, AP Physics. I just finished that class. Argh.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
5'd mostly for the name ; )
June 24th, 2006
(0)
physics?
June 24th, 2006
(0)
this is sooo smrt!!! so very smart indeed cuz theres physics in it lol man this is good lolloololo lol this fad never gets old seriously
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Bring back NEDM, "lol" isnt nearly as cool
June 24th, 2006
(0)
"i thought it was 9.81 m/s/s?" It depends on your location in relation to the gravitational field (altitude).
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol gravity
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Make him crash and you get a full five.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
I lol'd.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Wow, all you did was rotate the image and change the word "internet" to "gravity". Sorry.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
significant figures can bite my ass!! lol 5
June 24th, 2006
(0)
That was quick.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
too bad he doesn't get faster over time...
June 24th, 2006
(0)
LOL acceleration of gravity!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
I always hated significant figures..
(0)
old, stupid and reused, gg
June 24th, 2006
(0)
ingenius
June 24th, 2006
(0)
I'm not going to downvote, but this graphic doesn't say "terminal velocity" to me. It's more like watching someone drive a rocket straight down, which would exceed by far the pull of gravity
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Make the text move with the original speech bubble and you get 5'd.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
g is equal to the gravitational constant times the mass of earth divided by the square of the distance between the object in question and the center of mass of the earth.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
DO AN INTEGRAL!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Sciiiiiiiiiiiience
June 24th, 2006
(0)
hooray for boring physics, thats the only thing i remember. still 5
June 24th, 2006
(0)
im a sucker for these 5'ed
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Meh, anybody could have done this. Fix the loop and you'll get a higher grade.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
9.8 m/s/s means the background should move exponentially faster. its only moving at a constant rate.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
not funny, and yes, I know acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s^2
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Haha, not bad.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
LOL Douches. 9.8 m/s^2 with DOWN being POSITIVE because it's the ACTING FORCE! Up would be -9.8m/s^2 because the force is opposite of gravity. Newbs.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
UPVOTATION FOR ALL!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
you=isaac newton
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Terminal velocity!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
having just finished taking physics, i find this incrdibly amusing. 5'd.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
4 for sig figs.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
-1 for the term sig figs @_@
(0)
People, start tagging your damn sites correctly. Sound and Image sources save a 1000 comments going "LOL WERZ DAT IMAGE/SOUND FRU
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Lol nice idea there. Points for originality.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Curse sig figs!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Yay!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
obey gravity...its the law.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
nice physics joke, cept your title units could be cleaned up by saying m/s^2.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
LOL, the rate of which something falls!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
haha sig figs!
June 24th, 2006
(0)
well m/s/s makes more sense if you think about it, because what you're saying is the speed is increasing by 9.8 m/s per second. seconds squared doesn't make much sense.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
0 image source + 0 music source + 0 description + 0 keywords = 1.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
June 24th, 2006
(0)
9.81 ms^-2. Slashes are seeing decreased usage.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
LOL
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Five for Sig Figs
June 24th, 2006
(0)
5'd for Newtonian physics
June 24th, 2006
(0)
I like the science.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
sound origin? image origin? creativity?
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lawl! smart
June 24th, 2006
(0)
HOW DID THIS TAKE THIS LONG TO MAKE.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Like many before me I'm sure, 5 for funny and -1 for bad fact.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Ow.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
somebody just turned 14
June 24th, 2006
(0)
Good one, falcobird.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
9.8 m/s/s = 5.5 × 10^13 teaspoon*horsepower/acre/calorie/fortnight
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol, the internet
June 24th, 2006
(0)
m/s/s= (m/s)*(1/s)=m/s^2 gg Pre-algebra, for the retards thinking it cancels to m.
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol rotated image + gay nerdy physics reference
June 24th, 2006
(0)
physics ftw
June 24th, 2006
(0)
lol 5 just because its verticle
June 25th, 2006
(0)
5 for physics