64=65? (math sucks)
Created on: November 28th, 2005
64=65? (math sucks)
cyanidebreathmint 
mathsucks.ytmnd.com
uncited
uncited

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(4.02) 424 15 149

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 1 0 0 64,324

Inbound links:

views url
1,637 http://www.wykop.pl/ramka/68379/64-65/
131 http://search.daum.net/
104 http://www.frihost.com/forums/vt-72466.html
45 https://www.bing.com
32 http://www.wykop.pl/link/68379/64-65/

Add a comment

Richtext is ON
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link
Please login or register to comment.
BuzzBomber
November 28th, 2005
5:19:15 PM CST
(0)
That's amazing! Really clever!
ScndPistonHonda
November 28th, 2005
5:22:35 PM CST
(0)
Wow.
SlidersRox
November 28th, 2005
5:22:57 PM CST
(0)
*gasp* !
Shades
November 28th, 2005
5:33:38 PM CST
(0)
i loled
webbslinga411
November 28th, 2005
5:34:42 PM CST
(-1)
5 me back christmasconan.ytmnd.com
SubwayArbys
November 28th, 2005
5:36:32 PM CST
(0)
never saw that technique... but very interesting.
WTFNation
November 28th, 2005
5:36:33 PM CST
(0)
WHOAMG! MINDf*ck!
Sharkface217
November 28th, 2005
5:38:29 PM CST
(0)
5
Spotz
November 28th, 2005
5:39:04 PM CST
(0)
I approve of this!
gorillaz87
November 28th, 2005
5:40:09 PM CST
(1)
Very clever. It's an optical illusion, of course, but still clever.
ScndPistonHonda
November 28th, 2005
5:43:56 PM CST
(0)
The squares must be changing size as they're shifting. Gotta watch again.
Simopen
November 28th, 2005
5:45:16 PM CST
(0)
What the Fück?
Simopen
November 28th, 2005
5:46:25 PM CST
(0)
I MEANT F*ck.
cauloille
November 28th, 2005
5:49:39 PM CST
(0)
(head explodes)
NeoEllis
November 28th, 2005
5:53:05 PM CST
(0)
Huh.
WesleyWillis
November 28th, 2005
5:54:47 PM CST
(0)
MINDf*ck
Nickolai
November 28th, 2005
5:56:38 PM CST
(0)
What you say!?
ManuelHung
November 28th, 2005
6:00:01 PM CST
(3)
The diagonals of the blue shape and the green shape (and likewise of the red and the orange) in the 5 x 13 figure look like they match up, but they actually don't. There's a narrow gap between them, too narrow to see easily, but when it's added up over
Tahur
November 28th, 2005
6:00:17 PM CST
(0)
the triangles arent really triangles. 5'd for concept
Ryro
November 28th, 2005
6:01:49 PM CST
(0)
LOL at ManuelHung trying to be smart: http://volokh.com/posts/1093524465.shtml
ScndPistonHonda
November 28th, 2005
6:06:13 PM CST
(2)
No, Manhung is right. Here's how it happens. When the pieces break off, the edge where it was broken gets thicker. But when the pieces are put back together they're put back with these larger pieces. This extra space, added up among all the lines, accou
Patman4556
November 28th, 2005
6:06:22 PM CST
(0)
thats really cool
ScndPistonHonda
November 28th, 2005
6:07:32 PM CST
(0)
nts for the difference in area.
Ryro
November 28th, 2005
6:07:40 PM CST
(0)
I know ManuelHung was right, because HE COPIED AND PASTED IT OFF THE LINK I POSTED.
schavira
November 28th, 2005
6:09:54 PM CST
(0)
WTF
OzzieAlThor
November 28th, 2005
6:10:20 PM CST
(0)
Loving it.
Vash187
November 28th, 2005
6:16:27 PM CST
(0)
TEH UNIVER IS IMPLODING!
Pookatooka
November 28th, 2005
6:21:32 PM CST
(0)
i don't think the slopes are the same though =X
nuothe11th
November 28th, 2005
6:23:14 PM CST
(0)
There is an area equal to one whole block missing smack dab in the middle of the diagonal "line." It is especially clear when they show the two blocks next to eachother.
sheepiroth
November 28th, 2005
6:26:04 PM CST
(0)
enough of these chinese mind tricks! lol nice ytmnd. very clever
warchief36
November 28th, 2005
6:31:23 PM CST
(0)
holy sh*t dude!
calltojohn
November 28th, 2005
6:33:03 PM CST
(0)
you have unraveled the fabrics of the space time continuum
signjets
November 28th, 2005
6:37:18 PM CST
(0)
The slope of the lines are 3/8 and 2/5 so they don't line up perfectly, leaving a thin gap which is hidden by the outlines.
DoomBoom
November 28th, 2005
6:37:42 PM CST
(0)
had i not just figured it out after 30 minutes of cutting and fitting paper, i would've taken it to my algebra 2 teacher and looked really stupid. 4'd for *ssholery
Easton
November 28th, 2005
6:38:52 PM CST
(0)
What song is that, that is playing in the background? I really like it.
Speedy
November 28th, 2005
6:42:59 PM CST
(0)
Yeah. If you look at the long diagonal on the rectangle, notice how the line is thicker in the middle and thin on the ends. It took me three minutes of staring to figure it out.
infinityDUCK
November 28th, 2005
6:49:47 PM CST
(0)
The law of fives is never wrong.
mikekz
November 28th, 2005
6:49:59 PM CST
(0)
WTF!? It's math.. on ytmnd!!! ONED!
EIDiablo
November 28th, 2005
6:50:08 PM CST
(0)
Too much moon language
SaitouHajime
November 28th, 2005
6:50:53 PM CST
(0)
White it's all an illusion, still entertaining.
bats
November 28th, 2005
7:00:26 PM CST
(0)
why is this recieving massive 5's..unoriginal :[ cmon
inkdrinker
November 28th, 2005
7:22:53 PM CST
(0)
Getting some original music instead of this overused horsesh*t will net you a 5 instead of a 3.
phire
November 28th, 2005
7:38:38 PM CST
(0)
totally baffled til i looked up the answer. 5'd for the brainf*cking
Boombomdeembom
November 28th, 2005
7:51:39 PM CST
(0)
Well Played.
goax2x
November 28th, 2005
8:02:37 PM CST
(-1)
1/5, its not true
XxTopCatxX
November 28th, 2005
8:03:11 PM CST
(0)
omg teh ski is faling
jetfoxx
November 28th, 2005
8:20:10 PM CST
(0)
its an optical illusion. Check your rises over runs and you'll find that one of the lines is not a line at all and is not straight. Though it was very clever :)
xXBubbaXx
November 28th, 2005
8:23:17 PM CST
(0)
Yeah, things don't quite line up, I tried with graph paper.
urmyarchenemy
November 28th, 2005
8:31:05 PM CST
(0)
Owww my brain!
DarkOwl
November 28th, 2005
8:46:21 PM CST
(0)
YourMaster
November 28th, 2005
8:46:34 PM CST
(0)
Unlike 1=.99, it's not mathamaticly accurate, but it's a fun and clever optical illusion nonetheless.
XIIIidiots
November 28th, 2005
9:08:54 PM CST
(0)
Stop it! You're hurting my head!
EMRenegadeS
November 28th, 2005
9:10:27 PM CST
(0)
Stop whining because it fooled you at first. 5'd for pissing so many people off.
n8phin
November 28th, 2005
9:12:28 PM CST
(0)
WTF!? It's math.. on ytmnd!!! FIVED!
thavi
November 28th, 2005
9:48:07 PM CST
(0)
I wish some mathemetician would crack that already
BigOlePappy
November 28th, 2005
9:51:31 PM CST
(0)
wtf
Pettitman
November 28th, 2005
9:58:12 PM CST
(0)
Look closely how the lines line up on the second rectangle. Notice any discrepancies?
St00pidman
November 28th, 2005
9:58:33 PM CST
(0)
5 for making my bwain aspwode.
crackyfan
November 28th, 2005
9:59:47 PM CST
(0)
Old puzzle. The trick is that the sections don't fit together perfectly when re-assembled.
jman1000
November 28th, 2005
10:10:23 PM CST
(0)
5'd for making n00bs go "zOMG MINDF*CK!!!1!1one!1"
jman1000
November 28th, 2005
10:14:57 PM CST
(0)
Wisteso
November 28th, 2005
10:55:57 PM CST
(0)
The slope of the diagonal between the red and green triangles comes out to two point six repeating (2.67~). The slope of the diagonals between the blue and orange is exactly two point five (2.5). When the shape is repositioned, the gap between the shapes
Wisteso
November 28th, 2005
10:56:59 PM CST
(0)
(continued) does not make itself apparent to the viewer. +5 for presentation though.
RockMFR
November 28th, 2005
11:12:46 PM CST
(0)
very clever.
Fatriani
November 28th, 2005
11:22:30 PM CST
(0)
the formula for the area of a square is; A=S^2 and a rectangle is A=bh, points for creativity but a 2 for lack of mathematics
therayven
November 28th, 2005
11:22:46 PM CST
(0)
MINDf*ck MINDf*ck MINDF-- *explodes viciously*
handsomemax
November 28th, 2005
11:36:38 PM CST
(0)
SETTLE DOWN NERDS!
rza84
November 29th, 2005
12:18:23 AM CST
(0)
SOMEONE UPDATE THIS IN ENNGGRISH PLEASE...and then we might have a winner.
anox
November 29th, 2005
1:10:47 AM CST
(0)
My mind just exploded.
leroywells
November 29th, 2005
1:57:22 AM CST
(0)
OMGZZ MY BRAINNNNN
cyanidebreathmint
November 29th, 2005
2:35:48 AM CST
(0)
I just changed the music.
anox
November 29th, 2005
3:17:30 AM CST
(0)
Sounds the same to me. Then again, YTMND is broken right now :|
Tokar
November 29th, 2005
5:04:24 AM CST
(0)
Bah, not this optical illusion again. The two 5x8 "triangles" which make up the 5x8 rectangle are not in fact triangles. If you were to view a high resolution image of the two triangles you would see that they are actually quadrilaterals and not trian
Voca
November 29th, 2005
9:36:31 AM CST
(0)
I'm scared.
maplejet
November 29th, 2005
11:01:09 AM CST
(0)
What the hell
DanTheMan101
November 29th, 2005
2:44:56 PM CST
(0)
Ill show this to my math teacher to stupify her
Xilofox
November 29th, 2005
3:47:07 PM CST
(0)
MINDf*ck
byelf2007
November 29th, 2005
3:53:21 PM CST
(0)
Wait...
banditkade
November 29th, 2005
5:02:22 PM CST
(0)
Nonono... they are still triangles... no doubt. They don't fit together, realistically.
banditkade
November 29th, 2005
5:04:43 PM CST
(0)
Notice: The slope of blue/orange is 2/5, while red/green is 3/8. While they are very close, they could vener fit, due to the fact that they are different slopes
elementx
November 29th, 2005
6:14:34 PM CST
(0)
lol @ people who suck at math.
Neilyos
November 29th, 2005
6:50:16 PM CST
(0)
awesome
Spitzel
November 29th, 2005
7:19:21 PM CST
(0)
mathowns.ytmnd.com you sunnava bitch
Odworth
November 29th, 2005
8:40:02 PM CST
(0)
holy carp
thekillersnail
November 29th, 2005
9:02:51 PM CST
(0)
1'd for crap loop of a great song it deserves better a hell of a lot better!! cuz fight club owns you in the face! and you got owned by mathowns.ytmnd.com
syphonbyte
November 29th, 2005
9:48:30 PM CST
(0)
Doesn't work though, the slope on 2 of the triangles is 3/8 and on the others it's 2/5, that's not the same. YOU LOSE.
inkdrinker
November 30th, 2005
1:06:01 AM CST
(0)
OH HOT sh*t. You used the loop from the 9/11 flash! Your 3 is now officially a 5. Yes. Inkdrinker gives 5s sometimes.
inkdrinker
November 30th, 2005
1:09:24 AM CST
(0)
Have you considered making the background the same color as that yellow? It might look smoother.
csartanis
November 30th, 2005
5:13:41 AM CST
(0)
fix the sound, pops a bit
Nokkis
November 30th, 2005
8:28:54 AM CST
(0)
http://ilikecheeeze.ytmnsfw.com/ Has better sound, too.
Spitzel
November 30th, 2005
4:50:37 PM CST
(0)
mathowns.ytmnd.com you sunnava bitch
BIOS9
December 1st, 2005
12:14:43 AM CST
(0)
hey what was the original song you used, before you changed it.
Unsure
December 2nd, 2005
6:51:11 PM CST
(0)
MINDf*ck
BIOS9
December 2nd, 2005
10:33:40 PM CST
(0)
original song plsssssssssssssssss
Bobwith2os
December 3rd, 2005
7:50:37 PM CST
(0)
Lol although this is confusing.
Papahrf
December 6th, 2005
12:20:36 PM CST
(0)
I liked it, showed my math professor, he says it's called a "Fudge" factor. Someone mentioned how the edges are stretched already. Lousy optical illusions.
GCNMario
December 8th, 2005
12:48:07 AM CST
(0)
Different dimentions. 8x8 as a whole square grid would produce 64. It's different when you separate them into pieces, since you get different results, depending on the way you cut the grid into pieces. More like logic, if you think about it. ;)
g0zer
December 9th, 2005
4:47:47 AM CST
(0)
NO! THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS!!!
Will-The-Great
December 9th, 2005
4:59:31 PM CST
(0)
FTW?
inkdrinker
December 11th, 2005
6:31:11 PM CST
(0)
With the music as it is, I almost expect the screen to be interrupted by "MATH LEAVES WRECKAGE. IT MESSES UP THE GROUND."
inkdrinker
December 11th, 2005
6:32:13 PM CST
(0)
Also, GCNMario must have failed math class.
Umaycallusq
January 20th, 2006
8:59:58 PM CST
(0)
5 because it hurts my brain.
MrMario
January 28th, 2006
11:26:12 AM CST
(0)
I understand what the deal is. You create a small parallelogram with an area of 1. So 8*8=5*13-1.
Zerofire0
February 5th, 2006
2:08:50 AM CST
(0)
thats pretty trippy.
GugloPWN
February 20th, 2006
4:55:24 PM CST
(0)
Wow, just Wow
Rocafella
February 21st, 2006
11:58:32 AM CST
(0)
Would be odd if the corners matched up in the final rectangle, so 5'd for fooling all the morons who cant see.
reekofputrefaction
February 21st, 2006
1:57:08 PM CST
(0)
AHHHHHH!!!! Here's some more mysterious math for you... 666 = jesus getting *ss raped by lucifer while he smokes a fat cuban
Narmo
March 11th, 2006
4:19:54 PM CST
(0)
Everything I know is a lie!
magicalcranberry
March 16th, 2006
12:51:10 AM CST
(0)
wow, an interesting ytmnd that isn't a fad. good job sir. AND i fixed flashing hitler like you recommended connectfuhrer.ytmnd.com
fatcat
March 17th, 2006
9:26:03 PM CST
(0)
wow
anotherfreak
March 28th, 2006
9:26:59 PM CST
(0)
we all gonna die now?
Joreal
March 30th, 2006
11:59:53 PM CST
(0)
This is better than Finding X.
dady5000
May 3rd, 2006
6:20:04 PM CDT
(0)
wtf?
tweek-20k
May 3rd, 2006
11:36:34 PM CDT
(0)
It's pretty easy to spot the error, even by visual inspection. 3/8 != 2/5, so the slopes don't match up exactly.
Bodster
May 5th, 2006
10:18:45 AM CDT
(0)
The joining angle of going across the oblong is not an exact fit. In fact, the gap it leaves is exactly 1 square.
Schwarg
May 5th, 2006
8:48:15 PM CDT
(0)
amazing
lawnchair
May 7th, 2006
3:05:25 PM CDT
(0)
would get a 5 if it said something about how it doesn't work. There are also way better false proofs out there.
Ablationer
May 7th, 2006
6:13:49 PM CDT
(0)
Oh long johnson ... also cocks
GeneralFatman
June 1st, 2006
12:43:31 AM CDT
(0)
What the.... someone set up us the bomb.
CannibalTom
June 3rd, 2006
2:13:09 PM CDT
(0)
boring
DrunkCanuck
June 5th, 2006
8:42:44 PM CDT
(0)
You fried my brain. How come these balls are wet?
ac6517
June 13th, 2006
5:52:17 PM CDT
(0)
whoa sweet
somedude41582
June 19th, 2006
10:33:59 PM CDT
(0)
universe tier!
loverofanus
June 24th, 2006
8:05:23 PM CDT
(0)
that was awsome, why did you spend time finding this out?
Booster37
June 25th, 2006
1:48:36 PM CDT
(0)
Nothing special. Area of shapes after shifting location doesn't prove anything.
jelloissquishy100
July 1st, 2006
5:31:38 PM CDT
(0)
Now I'm confused... lol.
JenovaSephiroth
July 18th, 2006
1:03:08 PM CDT
(0)
Awesome find, I give it five stars, but unfortuantely, there is an explanation. *sigh* Anyway, the slope of the diagonal line of the triangle and the diagonal line of the trapezoid aren't the same, they are slightly off. When you put the two triangles and trapezoids back together for the rectangle, the diagonal line is in fact not a line at all, but a paralellogram with an area of 1. I'm surprised no one explained this yet.
BlueNight
July 22nd, 2006
11:59:17 AM CDT
(0)
The fractional difference in slopes along the diagonal in the new rectangle add up to exactly 1.
LordoftehIntarweb
August 3rd, 2006
8:24:55 PM CDT
(0)
Ahhh crazy!
KartingMad
August 15th, 2006
2:56:20 PM CDT
(0)
This ytmnd doesn't work, look at the website below: http://mathsrules.ytmnd.com
Rranzok
August 22nd, 2006
8:59:55 PM CDT
(0)
Yes?!
CrazyYetItWorks
August 24th, 2006
7:21:11 PM CDT
(0)
Mind = blown
Lasada
August 24th, 2006
7:22:01 PM CDT
(0)
No, but nice try.
Dr-Pimper
September 4th, 2006
10:55:11 AM CDT
(0)
What...the...f00k
ViciousCannibal
September 9th, 2006
9:33:42 PM CDT
(0)
You made me stare blankly at the screen after this ytmnd. Good j0rb.
DevilAsh
September 12th, 2006
3:30:31 PM CDT
(0)
Not really that good... Its like saying 02 has 2 oxygen atoms, then ya re-arange the protons and electrons and 'omg wow :O its changed!' -.-
ObadiahtheSlim
September 18th, 2006
8:01:34 AM CDT
(0)
the rectangle isn't really a rectangle. There is 1 square's worth of empty space along the "diagnal" which isn't even perfectly diagnal.
fjafjan
October 2nd, 2006
6:35:28 AM CDT
(0)
Well after all 0.999 repeating is 1 :)
nego
December 30th, 2006
4:12:13 PM CST
(0)
Lines don't fit perfectly, all these f*cking gook math sites have either lines not fitting perfectly or lines not perfectly straight.
ArtCritic
January 1st, 2007
2:46:17 AM CST
(0)
You fail. http://mathrules.ytmnd.com/ ftw!
jtn2002
January 22nd, 2007
11:59:59 PM CST
(0)
Math still rules supreme. 5 for making the math major think!
Zott
February 5th, 2007
1:43:02 AM CST
(0)
You bring up an interesting point, and in response I say that.....
InsertDumbName
February 12th, 2007
8:29:00 PM CST
(0)
Im sorry but the angle of the hypontunses doesnt line up its just slightly off... FAIL!!!
DarkLadyMara
March 4th, 2007
7:17:20 AM CST
(0)
Awesome, took me a while to figure it out too.
Doombringer55
March 26th, 2007
9:39:07 PM CDT
(0)
For a second I thought that was true. Oh well, we can't all win.
AnacondaHL
June 22nd, 2007
2:34:05 AM CDT
(0)
A very old math trick, but I like seeing it animated like that. BTW, the hypotenuses of each main triangle are bent outwards slightly (mathematically and barely visually).
prairiedogeric10
September 19th, 2008
2:53:30 PM CDT
(0)
saw this come up in YTMND Spy
Flame47
September 26th, 2008
10:21:17 PM CDT
(0)
5 for the Fight Club music
MikStarYo
July 12th, 2010
11:35:09 PM CDT
(0)
whoa