Mass Carriers = win
Created on: August 6th, 2005
Mass Carriers = win

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.35) 17 0 7

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 2,343

Inbound links:

views url
49 https://www.bing.com
5 http://www.google.com.hk
2 http://www.google.com
1 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/Garfgarog
1 http://www.google.com/search?q=ytmnd%20mass%20carriers

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
August 6th, 2005
(0)
f*cking RIGHT man, let any country try to f*ck with us, we will run them into the ground, nuke the f*ckers back to the stone age, there won't be people living there for 2000 years. USA!!!!
August 6th, 2005
(0)
oh yeah, DID catch on to that SC sh*t to, sad but true, carriers with the right supportive stuff, always win. ^____^ GG
August 6th, 2005
(0)
Should use a more modern carrier like the Nimitz class carriers.
August 8th, 2005
(0)
How do you empty an american building? You throw paper planes at it.
August 26th, 2005
(0)
ftw
December 10th, 2005
(0)
And that's why Japan lost WWII...
December 29th, 2005
(0)
If you guys thinl that's smart your dead wrong. Clustering all your billion dollar ships together where one nuke will waste them is stupid.