Like a black cloak caught in the midnight winds of winter I will flutter through the window of Mark McGwire's home and secret myself within his drop ceiling. Thusly concealed, I will wait for him to slumber. While he sleeps with parted lips I will slowly lower a wire down to his mouth and let gravity carry a fortune in anabolic steroids down his gullet. He will drink heartily, for the taste suits him well. By dawn he will be a cube of muscle and hate. It will take only a shove and a look at your photograph and you will have a primal destructive force unleashed in your direction. Synthetic hormones will boil his brain until he has no will, no desire, but to crush you into a meaty paste beneath his cubical body.
Wow, SA is trying to be like YTMND by being all anti-ebaums. Too bad they're 3 days too late. Looks like everybody's trying to cash in on ytmnd's popularity.
attention alex trebek just said youre the man now dog on jeperdy, someone clip this if it's on again. p.s sorry to use the news like this but i need to get word out lol
*******
For everyone who wants to boycott businesses who use eBaum's to advertise:
Fill her up:
http://new.petitiononline.com/bcttebum/petition.html
A petition aimed towards the businesses..
Wouldn't hurt to attach to any emails and let em know we're thinking of them
********
It's going to be hard to say that you're not supporting or having anything to do with this whole fiasco when you post stuff like this on the main page max.
I think those of you that are saying this was unfunny probably have trouble understanding over the top sarcasm and irony. Because some of it was indeed pretty funny. "I will have batteries of prayers being launched to the heavens" = rofl
The funny part is that you guys defended the "copyright" of a guy who made his picture by stealing from magazines and photographers. If you defend copyright, you're opening the floodgates to destroying almost all the cool sh*t on the internet. Do you really think we'd survive a lawsuit for the trillion Mario sites? For the use of the Muhammad Hassan theme? For sampling ANY musician with deep pockets? For running whole scenes of Family Guy? Find a better reason to hate ebaums (there are plenty) and quit being hypocrites on this intellectual property sh*t.
arte, max never said he had nothing to do with any of this. What he said was he had nothing to do with the death threats and people ddosing ebaums will and going to their property lol of their own free will. He is in no legal trouble but that doesn't mean he's not against ebaums world's practices, read his reply to neil bauman again...
They're Somewhat protected as long as they continue to keep citing exactly where they get their content. Otherwise they don't have a leg to stand on. By they i mean everyone online that makes or uses this stuff
inkdrinker there is a difference between intellectual property that is used as parody as so many people have mentioned, and this lindsay lohan doesn't change facial expressions was a compilation of various images. It was a creative "product" so to speak. Whereas if ebaums world took a family guy scene just like ytmnd, nobody would be in an uproar over that. There are huge differences here.
There's a huge ARTISTIC difference. The legal difference is very very slim. Don't act like I don't understand the implications of sampling, okay? Sampling is valid art. It's also a sure way to get sued if you don't clear your samples with the original artist. There's no way we can have it both ways here. Either we're pirates and we make kick-ass stuff and copyrights be damned, or we care about intellectual property and we delete almost every single site here.
Trouble ahead, guys... check Ebaum's home page and you'll find that the (invalid, as of now) Lohanfacial link is back up.
This can't be anything good...
"Here is my final offer: tomorrow at midnight I will delete anything with the term 'eBaum'. I offer to do this for you if you remove lohanfacial.html from your website."
I say we wait and see what happens. Could just be an angry moderator or some crazed forumer who hacked admin privaledges. It's just as nice to see Ebaum's having internal problems then having problems from us :)
inkdrinker you are mistaken. very very mistaken. there is a big difference between what max is doing with this "hobby" site and the Baumans making 2 million dollars per YEAR with their site. Get a grip on reality.
ok i just saw a ytmnd w a screenshot of the ebaums fourms and its says hes thinking of buying newgrounds, WE MUST PROTECT OUR FELLOW SITES AGAINST THE ERIC MEANCE (i copyright that term bc i know it rocks)
there was a ytmnd a few days ago that had a screen shot of cnn.com saying ebaum bought ytmnd.com so go look for that post before starting up a fuss over a screenshot
Freemark, do you think I can't tell the difference? But it's a moral difference. Not a legal one. Just because Max is a good guy and this site is sometimes funny doesn't mean illegal is now legal. Don't debate me unless you can dredge up some court cases to prove me wrong. (And while this isn't making Max money, you might notice he's selling ads. And shirts. And sponsorship slots.)
Basically, I'm saying I don't dispute the ARTISTIC AND MORAL validity of jacking people's sh*t to make YTMNDs. It's a shame we're talking LEGAL. Which is what EVERYONE was talking about before I backed them into a corner on this. DMCA doesn't make provisions for "it stole AND it sucks" or "it stole AND its creator is a douchebag." If YTMND actually tries to pursue some kind of copyright protection bullsh*t, it's going to be the beginning of the end.
Everything he is fan made, perfectly legal. If you think that's illegal then you have already lost, parody work is legal if it doesn't yield money, and not a single member is getting money from it.
(Max is selling ads, shirts and sponsorships. That's money, even if his operating costs are more than his income.) And parody laws have a lot less wiggle room when you're using the original product, rather than just a very close copy.
Not that I'm suggesting that we stop using licensed material, because that's most of this site's charm.. but we probably don't want to open that particular can of worms.
Exactly. I'm all for using stolen material. Because, like I said, I respect the artistic validity of it. I think stolen art is a fantastic creation, and I think recontextualizing it is important. But let's not be litigious DMCA douchebags over stuff that we stole ourselves. I've said it before, but destroy ebaums because they suck sh*t. Not because they steal.
Yeah. That's what I mean. We do steal, but it's just pics. They accuse us of "stealing" materail, but look at them. There's nothing wrong with the materail we have. But really, the eBaumers are pricks.
I'm not talking about ebaums already! I'm saying WHAT WE DO BREAKS COPYRIGHT LAW. And that puts us in a really terrible spot to try and enforce any (imagined) copyright we may have.
"parody does provide some protection and to some extent, depending on the circumstances, parody may permit the use of copyrighted or trademarked material" - okay, now take this "some extent" and "depending" and "may protect" and put it up against high-priced lawyers. The legal protection of parody is limited and fuzzy. And plenty of what we host is NOT parody, including clips lifted from TV shows in their entirety, for example.
I could really give a rat's *ss about anybody's copyright laws. I just enjoy having fun and making people laugh, and unless some lawyer, judge or FBI Cyber Terrorist Sexual Victims Delta Squad Task Force busts down my door and tells me to stop then I just don't think about it.
Ottervomit: Nobody's disputing that here. Nobody wants to get rid of the sites that violate copyright. But how can we violate copyright and consider the whole world fair use then flip the f*ck out and cry DMCA any time someone takes our work? Anybody who tries to explain the difference between ebaums lift and our lifts see my above posts. Artistic and moral validity aren't what we're talking about. We're talking strictly legal.
Here's a link for you guys - http://www.negativland.com/fairuse.html
Negativland are a group that uses samples from popular music to create collage pieces.. not unlike what we are doing here. Read that link and more here - http://www.negativland.com/intprop.html to see the kinds of issues they have had with "fair use" laws.
Yeah. I love Negativland. Unlike a lot of people here, they understand that underground art means you have to be ready for "underground" sh*t. It's the cost of having all this awesome free material.
I could care less about copyright laws. I don't think we have any copyright laws, to ANYTHING. But who cares? 0mG som1 made a vid of a nEw show!! SuE thm!! I mean, it's enterntainment, and nothing else.
Inkdrinker: Nobody here is thinking of suing ebaumsworld. But there is a difference between us using material to amuse the other users on this site, and ebaums using it to make millions on advertising. The fact that he is making ludicrous amounts of money off things lifted from hobby sites just pisses more than a few people off.
You're right. They took ONE image, and everyone flips out. I, at first, thought they actually did something bad. But they took an image. Sure, eBaums World sucks, but..... It's just...... an image. Enterntainment. Money? No. Just enterntainment.
islesfan3421, this is straight from Max's news post: "I'm working on a "legal" area of the site with copyright information and DMCA takedown forms you guys can use if anything like this ever comes up in the future"
Some of the stuff we make, like the medieval things, are purely YTMND, with no copyrighted material at all, and some things are user created gifs, that are genuinely our own. We wouldn't have gotten anywhere with the Lohan thing, but other issues might come up where it could be useful.
"There's nothing wrong with it. We have the right to use what we want." Which would mean even Ebaum has the right to steal from us, even if he's a douchebag. That's the point I've been trying to make all along. We can't scream bloody murder about intellectual property one minute and steal the next.
see, I dont know what you guys are mad about, but I wasnt so much mad that someone else used the YTMND stuff, its put out there and designed to make people laugh, I was pissed off about the fact that he makes money off of it. THAT is the only thing that made me mad. sharing is cool, but not when you share and then the other dude makes 2,000,000 a year on it... (obviously he doesnt make that because of this one ytmnd, but its the point)
Legally speaking, I wouldn't care to postulate on Eric Bauman's practices or anyone else's for that matter, as I am not qualified. One must assume however that since its been stated that he has a "team of lawyers" that someone has challenged him before in a legal arena and failed. So legally he is probably in the clear somehow, even though there is no doubt he is a douschebag and almost universally hated. A successful legal assault against ebaums could backfire on YTMND considerably.
would still like him to give the source though... thats what the true war is about... its not the fact that he makes money off it, its the fact that people intellectual property is not correctly posted and is posted without any comment for the original artist
UncleHams is quite pleased. I also enjoyed having a chat in erics sh*ty chat room. so many queers in there, I almost turned gay reading all of it. YTMND for life. Long live these other sites who support YTMND.
So? That means we steal images all the time. Even if you credit the owner, without the owner's permission, it's stealing. We've stolen from eBaums world before.
I Think all work we do ourselves should be highly watermarked... also, hidden images added into it... various tuts found here http://good-tutorials.com/search/query/hidden%20image
When you make a YTMND, you have to put the image and sound source(s) so technecly, the original owner gets credited. Ebaumsworld doesn't have that with their subsmission thingy though.
These past few days we have experienced the only a bit of the TRUE POWER the internet, and its inhabitants, have. If this war involved the WHOLE INTERNET. Damn, this place would be f*cked up.