Inside Ron Paul's Brain
Created on: June 1st, 2007
Ron's disturbing visions...
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.74) | 42 | 3 | 12 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,219 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 47 | https://www.bing.com |
| 4 | http://www.google.com.hk |
| 2 | http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?14522-Ron-Paul-has-t |
| 2 | http://www.google.com |
| 2 | https://google.com |
John Edwards believes in pulling out of
IRAQ, but without the negative trade
offs.
NEGATIVES you will have to deal with:
Ron Paul does not value equal rights for
minorities.
R P would deny women control of their
bodies and reproductive rights.
R P would be disastrous for the working
class. abolishing minimum wage.
R P’s policies would cause damage to our
already strained environment.
R P would butcher our already sad
educational system.
R P is opposed to the separation of
church and state.
Uh, I'd Vote for Edwards first, though I think that Paul would be better for the west in general as opposed to the average American... but your arguments don't hold water. He's a strict constitutionalist and this includes separation of church and state. And I've never heard him mention an abolition of the minimum wage as part of his platform. He intends to be the President, not legislative head of the Republicans, and as a result would never get congress to do most of the things you're screaming about.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link