The Problem with Circular Reasoning
Created on: March 26th, 2007
It is suppose to be a spoof. Not sure how good it is but I enjoyed making it. Let me know what you think. As a warning, this is not suppose to be taken literally. There IS false information as well.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (2) | 4 | 0 | 1 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,342 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 2 | https://www.google.com/ |
| 1 | http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en |
| 1 | https://google.com |
Some spelling errors, some serious conceptual errors, and then you just start confusing words and concepts without defining them. The scientific method is for EMPIRICALLY proving hypotheses, that is, by observed evidence rather than by reason alone. Reason: a priori, before experiencing something, you can know what is true and false. Mathematics and logic, for example. Science: a posteriori, after experience you determine empirically why things are what they are, even if they could be otherwise.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link