No Wacky Search Engine Trickery Is Required
Created on: July 26th, 2006
All it takes is a straightforward name search, no trickery necessary. Google knows what time it is.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.95) | 501 | 8 | 77 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 22,409 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 52 | https://www.bing.com |
| 3 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 2 | https://www.google.com/ |
| 1 | http://www.google.com |
| 1 | https://www.google.com.au |
Yeah, I don't doubt the results are different now - this is a few days old, and for some bizarre reason it appeared on the front page again tonight. Google's in a state of constant flux - you are looking at a frozen moment in time - I assure you all it isn't doctored - I did the search, was struck by the results, screengrabbed it.
You never see "1 for Windows XP" from Mac users. Maybe I should be bitter and downvote Mac downvoters - but then I think, "they're using Windows - that's its own karmic reward." I will briefly plug Ubuntu Linux here. Non-Mac users and even Mac haters - give Ubuntu a try. It made a Linux believer out of this hardcore Mac user, and it's totally free. Here endeth the commercial.
Average... at best. It blows my mind how many hits this has gotten, compared to sites that I actually busted my *ss to make. I was just looking for a picture of Bauman, and the barrage of negative search results amused me. This is no work of genius - I chuckled, and snapped it. It's a bit embarrassing that it's gotten an obscene number of views (compared to other, better things I've done). I'd like to think it's the MC Ren, but I know it's the Bauman factor.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link