Disney doesn't change
Created on: May 6th, 2006
Disney has cheated my childhood. I didn't steal it from ebaums world. I got it off a russian site. I never vist ebaums world so I didnt know they had it on there also.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (4.46) | 1,670 | 200 | 312 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 311,109 |
Inbound links:
The copyage probably has to do with when they started using Xerox for transferring drawings onto cells when they made 101 Dalmatians. From there I guess they decided to copy animation of older movies that way and alter it to save money. Most blatant case of this is in Robin Hood's Phony King of England song, it's like "Guess the Movie" there.
The Sword in the Stone is the worst of all. I swear... That movie has 2 completely different voice actors as the main character ( That or the Actor went from being age 10 to 25 during the acting process). Also they reuse the EXACT same sound clip of Arthur stumbling going "Woah what... WOAH!" 8 times throughout the movie.
What's with all the people jumping all up on this Ebaum's bandwagon? I haven't been to that sh*t site in over a year, so I'd never even know that he could have gotten it from there. Of course, he linked HIS source, and it wasn't Ebaums, so get off Baumans c*ck and let this guy post his YTMND. Bauman's got his high-priced lawyers to fight his fights, he doesn't need you fanboys and YTMND doesn't need ebaum's fanboys here either.
It is dumb that some people are saying Disney is lazy for reusing some animations. They probably just rotoscoped over real actors and just reused it. Why waste money and time filming more footage of the same exact thing? Even moreso, why should someone even care? Funny ytmnd but Disney certaintly doesn't suck because of stuff like this.
I don't see these things as diminishing these movies... Winnie the Pooh, Sword in the Stone, and the Jungle Book all deserve their status as classic animation.
So what if they reused some animation? Pfft. There are some cartoons out now that reuse animation constantly and nobody's childhood has been hurt...
they call it limited animation... you can find it everywhere if you look for it. Especially TV shows. hanna barbera actually managed to stay afloat during an animation bust period because of their constant reusal of animation, and it carried over into plot as well, take for example, Scooby Doo. Also notice how lots of characters wear ties, collars and scarfs as a way to easily conceal disparity between moving and nonmoving cells... real animation costs a sh*tload, or used to
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link