Throgan's recent comments:

January 12th, 2007
AH! The second half of that quote is great for this as well!: "Wow, look at the tits!... I bet there's... 57 tits up there!" Add please!
October 25th, 2006
I'm Spiderman. Oh, and maybe some more stuff like Stalone, where it's not a name, but just "I'm your worst nightmare." Search around for stuff like that and it'd be funny. Also, even though everyone else caught it, slowing down the Poland thing for a few more frames so everyone could understand it wouldn't hurt.
September 25th, 2006
Yes! Go SSB! +Kirby and yeah, -1 for SnoopDog
September 24th, 2006
On on the site ?Neo: Messianic Retard
I haven't laughed that hard at audio alone in ages!! 5 and faved.
September 23rd, 2006
YES! Go Henry Wrinkler!!! HOORAY ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT!!! By the way, he most definitely didn't do that move in AD on accident - there's no way.
September 23rd, 2006
THAT'S SO WRONG!!!!
September 22nd, 2006
He was the only good part of the episode: "Help" Exclamation point. "Fire" exclamation point. "Looking forward to hearing from you!" and the emergency number! haha!
September 22nd, 2006
On on the site ?Colbert retaliates
5 'cause Carrell lived in my hometown - plus I love the both of them!
September 22nd, 2006
On on the site ?Classic Nick :(
5 JUST for Eureka's castle. I would give more if I could in the name of Rocko and Doug... too bad I never had cable and couldn't enjoy them as much. Although, it could do without a lot of the not-so-classic shows on there.
September 22nd, 2006
5 for Matrix. -1 'cause I'm sick of the tubes.
September 22nd, 2006
On on the site ?ARTMND
Pretty cool actually. Not funny or whatever... but nice.
September 20th, 2006
NEDM was not a surprise for 2 reasons: 1) it's not synced correctly so saw the image about 4 seconds before the sound, 2) the long pause for "i lied" provides WAY too much time for us to figure it out.
September 18th, 2006
There are some awesome pics in here, but it's degraded by some of the cool poses, but uncute kittens (i.e. CATS). If you focus more on the big-eyed soft-looking dudes and it's golden.
September 15th, 2006
Nice! 5 partly for the cleverness, but mostly 'cause I love that part of "Shaun" when they hit that guy in tune to the song!
September 15th, 2006
Could have longer cuts on Stan, but otherwise great.
September 14th, 2006
On on the site ?Downvote therapy
SO Predictable it's not even funny... literally. Well made gets it the 3
September 14th, 2006
On on the site ?HAL goes crazy.
As a fan of the show (well I was before I got too busy) and of the computer from 2001, I don't feel bad voting higher than I htink it deserves otherwise.
September 14th, 2006
Not that great. Plus, where are sources? I feel like I've seen this before and it's killing me to know where it came from!!!
September 13th, 2006
On on the site ?*~A Tiny Glimpse~*
For the most part it's OK, but it moves a LITTLE bit too fast for slow readers like me (the first frame especially, then some of the last few as well).
September 11th, 2006
loop it better. See if you can make only 1 cycle rather than 2 - I think it'll work better.
September 10th, 2006
On on the site ?they are coming
3, +1 for sound! =D
September 10th, 2006
Homestar gets the 5... barely
September 10th, 2006
On on the site ?5 star meal.
that's one of the best, 'cause I couldn't get the lobster meat out of my head to figure out what it ws really saying - had to lose my eyes.
September 9th, 2006
It took me a second, but I got it. =D
September 9th, 2006
On on the site ?IT'S GON' RAIN!
I love that quote - making it an animation would be better.
September 9th, 2006
Maybe it's just me, but I like the last line also because Stan is waving his hands around so much! "Let's not always see the same hands."
September 9th, 2006
From the 3 you make 8 1s, you add those 1s to the 3 and you get 1-3 base 8 or in other words in base 10 you have 11 and you take away 7 and 7 from 11 is 4! Now go back to the 64s, you're left with 2 and you take away 1 from 2 and that leave... now let's not always see the same hands.
September 9th, 2006
Continuing tikkshamur (good job by the way) : ...And you take away three, that's 7, OK? Now instead of 4 in the 8's place you've got 3 'cause you added 1 - that is to say 8 - to the 2, but you can't take 7 from 3 so you look at the 64s.
September 9th, 2006
...huh???