You Paultards make me sick. And he's my representative, too...having met the man, I know he's a nice guy who means well. He's done a great job in our district. But the effect of his policies on a federal level would result in a confederacy of sovereign states...and since a system of FEDERALISM has been present and effective since the framing of the Constitution, that would be a serious problem. Breaking the system under the guise of "liberty" is not a proper method of bringing about change.
And just because someone else sees you for what you are doesn't mean I have an alt. And, I'm through with this. There will be no convincing you to see things my way, and I'm sure your response to this will be as the child you would have liked to make me out to be. But I'm done. Say whatever you want, I don't care. At least I can maintain some of MY dignity.
I avoided the Internet before I read the book. You know why? Because I knew about the leak, and knew the book would be spoiled for me if I went...basically, anywhere. People with common sense would be cautious. This is natural selection, at its most mundane level. No one who wasn't an idiot would have the book spoiled for them unless they had a curiousity...which I'm guessing is what happened with you. If that's true (but you'd never admit it), then I can understand where you're coming from...
No, I mean your insulting of people who know that this site isn't important enough to make a big deal over; no person who isn't genuinely curious about the book is going to go to this site...there's no fake title to hook anyone, it's blatant, the only reason people were upset is because they were dolts enough to think it WOULDN'T be a spoiler. And yes, I believe a study. You know why? Because the people who did it are credible, accomplished professionals who don't buy in to the idealism that you have.
Adding on a completely irrelevant anecdote that only makes him look foolish makes HIM childish; calling him on it isn't something a toddler would do. Regardless of the character limit, you still have yet to defend your idiocy. You think CAPITALIZING THINGS YOU SAY is going to help you in any way? Here's a clue; it isn't. And I've washed my hands of you, imbecile.
Oh, I see. Citing a source and NOT engaging in loud, angry, swear-filled rants in defense of my position makes me a child. I'll keep that in mind next time I want to be taken seriously.
For the love of God, STOP responding to your own comments. If you haven't enough werewithal to think of all you have to say in one reply, you don't have the intelligence to attempt to counter-argue with all of YTMND, who clearly are FOR the Potter spoilers.
And you're a terrible person for doing that to your sister. We don't KNOW these people, that's the point, ape.
I think I'll be like you and create an endless string of replies to myself to add on to my already ridiculous and unfounded argument, just in case there are a few people who DON'T already think I'm an idiot.
And then you respond to your own comment for the hell of it, calling people names because you're too much of an oblivious dolt to NOT read something you don't want to know.
You are aware that the section is labeled "Harry Potter Spoilers", right? And when you saw that it was labeled as such, you CONTINUED to read it? I guess it makes sense; Max IS the kind of person to label something and then have something completely different...'cause that's what labels are for.
Lord‑Pretzel's recent comments: