Scientology is Smart
Created on: June 10th, 2006
Scientology is Smart
Scientology really is THIS ridiculous.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(4.25) 1,370 80 292

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 69,241

Inbound links:

views url
46 https://www.bing.com
8 http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/the-unfunny-truth-about-scient
6 http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Oh_That_explains_it_FUUUUUUUUU?t=29296019&OTC-em-cr2cm
4 https://www.timer4web.com/
4 http://www.circvsmaximvs.com/showthread.php?t=4449

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
<< 1 2 >>
June 12th, 2006
(0)
tom cruise obeys scientology
June 12th, 2006
(0)
HELLO?!
June 12th, 2006
(0)
How many times did you crack up laughing before you could say it with a straight face?
June 12th, 2006
(0)
I did about 40 attempts, I made it through about 7 without too much laughter, and even during that one there were one or two moments that I had to pause to compose myself. I'm thinking about doing more "Voice based" YTMND's...This is just one of the voices I can do.
June 13th, 2006
(0)
That was a REALLY good voiceover. You have a great voice for this.
June 13th, 2006
(0)
great voiceover. good basic idea.
June 13th, 2006
(0)
Just curious, is this really in the book? I only ask because in the beginning it says something about leaving your body and going on an eternal journey with Xenu. Isn't Xenu supposed to be the evil guy trapped in a mountain by a force field run by an eternal battery? I don't know much about scientology, so some clarification would be most appreciated, but 5 anyways for being funny.
June 13th, 2006
(0)
LOLOL
June 13th, 2006
(0)
Ok, this is fantastic. It takes a mediocre smart missle fad and a mediocre scientology fad and combines them into a clever connection. Also I only listened to the first part of it, and if it changes significantly, it will definitely lose its charm.
June 13th, 2006
(0)
I don't see what people have against the "outburst." It doesn't go overboard, it's lovely. Errr and that puts me in the position of sounding like a crazy fangirl. Which I'm not. Reeeally...
June 13th, 2006
(0)
NinjaGeek: Like most of us I don't know much about, nor do I care much for Scientology. This is not actually what they believe. What they believe is even crazier. Once again, if you want to see where the idea came from check out http://tomahawk.ytmnd.com
June 13th, 2006
(0)
if that is real text from the book, then Scientology is reaalyy smart XD
June 13th, 2006
(0)
That was quite a great take on the tomahawk missile ytmnd, I laughed quite a bit ^_^ good job
June 13th, 2006
(0)
eeeeeeesssssss
June 13th, 2006
(0)
Great voice. Easy victory.
June 13th, 2006
(0)
Heh, how did you keep yourself from laughing the whole time you were saying this?
June 14th, 2006
(0)
The same way L.ROn Hubbard did; Lot's of Psychotropic Drugs.
June 14th, 2006
(0)
I got Firefox and I can hear it just fine. All of ArrowHead's sites = 1.
June 15th, 2006
(0)
rofl what
June 20th, 2006
(0)
5'd for bringing back the missile fad after I explained it all so long ago with my ytmnd. :-D
June 24th, 2006
(0)
YOU WIN 2 INTERNETS AND THE GALLACTIC ALLIANCE
June 27th, 2006
(0)
Very informative. Especially the bit about the soul knowing where it isn't. Who'd have thought it?
June 28th, 2006
(0)
Tomahawk FTW
(0)
This deserves an lol.
July 5th, 2006
(0)
can i get a hardcopy of that in writen text? e-mail me at burn_out10304@hotmail.com
July 15th, 2006
(0)
Eis.....eisnt...ahaha
(0)
I must say, that's the most logical thing I've ever heard that makes absolutely no sense. You know what's sad? My last sentence was exactly as logical as that passage from Dianetics....well done btw
(0)
My soul is not in the living room... so I must be where I am at the moment. Hubbard is a f*cking genius! 5'd for great justice.
(0)
"Holy sh*t. I'm giving this site a vote worthy of what it is and subtracting the vote worthy of what it wasn't. Or vice versa (whatever is greater)." This made me LOL too
July 28th, 2006
(0)
you fail, please try again ^_^
August 10th, 2006
(0)
rofl wofl lmao lol
August 12th, 2006
(0)
what?
August 19th, 2006
(0)
Would have been a lot better without the part at the end. 5 for the rest!
August 24th, 2006
(0)
You forgot Poland
August 25th, 2006
(0)
it's the Galactic CONFEDERACY, not the galactic alliance
August 26th, 2006
(0)
Head exploding goodness.
August 29th, 2006
(0)
lol, it was very very very very very long but worth it. 5.
September 15th, 2006
(0)
Scientology is against xenu, why dont people get this?
September 22nd, 2006
(0)
Well, I think you just summed up the book in about 2.5 minutes. Well played. 5 'n' fav fo' j00!
September 29th, 2006
(0)
I Loved your site http://SmartScientology.ytmnd.com 5'ed, check out my page votecoder5.ytmnd.com when you have time!
November 11th, 2009
(0)
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
November 11th, 2009
(0)
....The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
<< 1 2 >>