Are You Ready for TIME TRAVEL?
Created on: August 3rd, 2010
Are You Ready for TIME TRAVEL?
If I could turn back time, if I could find a way I'd take back those words that hurt you and you'd stay. I don't know why I did the things I did I don't know why I said the things I said.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.86) 29 1 12

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 2,417

Inbound links:

views url
46 https://www.bing.com
3 http://216.18.188.175:80
1 https://www.google.com/
1 http://www.ytmnsfw.com/sites/
1 http://www.google.com.au/search?q=are+you+ready+for+time+travel&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
August 4th, 2010
(0)
Maybe you could clarify for me what does and does not fall under the following statement:

"if i wanted to watch whatever this is, i'd watch whatever this is. instead, i came to ytmnd to see something original and clever and instead i find whatever this is."
August 4th, 2010
(0)
bah, i knew i had that coming. but i'm glad you brought it up. i believe in the virtue of classic style sites, although this is a piss poor example (especially so soon after that particular rant). this, yes, is basically a direct rip (and thus a pretty lousy site). the difference between the two is in the site i was originally talking about is basically a youtube video turned gif and posted here whereas this site is intended to highlight a line that i found particularly hilarious. classic sites are tricky like that because the right one can kill (see: [site this-rock:site], but one done in haste (or as a result of being stoned and watching napoleon dynamite) may not come off properly and will end up looking like, and being, a direct rip. IN CONCLUSION, this site is bad, but classic sites are not; that site is bad, and is not trying to be good.
August 4th, 2010
(0)
god dammit why can't i figure out this linking thing... [site http://this-rock:site]

maybe?
August 4th, 2010
(0)
fuckit just go watch http://this-rock.ytmnd.com as my personal example of a classic site.
August 5th, 2010
(0)
I wasn't trying to be sarcastic; I was genuinely curious. When I saw that comment, I felt like we were on the same page, but then I viewed this and thought I was missing something. Which is why I asked for clarification.

Regarding classic sites, I've always measured them against the original YTMND. It took a line from a movie and looped it, yes, but it also took it out of context, thereby creating something new. [site this-rock:site] is a fantastic example. This Napoleon Dynamite one feels like a retread of a scene in the movie.

I appreciate the thoughtful response.