Michael Richards speaks the truth
Created on: November 23rd, 2006
NSFW image hider
It's the truth. Words are what we make of them.

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.86) 310 7 72

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
1 1 0 0 17,236

Inbound links:

views url
86 https://www.bing.com
24 http://hesnotanigga.ytmnsfw.com/
14 http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?from=yandex.ru%3Bsearch%3Bweb%3B%3
6 http://www.google.com.hk
3 https://www.google.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
How come when 50 Cent says "n*gg*r" there's no press about it?
September 16th, 2009
(0)
I remember the waterfront one, and this is where I would concede if I was not playing the role of you, but I am, so I am just going to say this: those aren't funny, interesting or truly creative so they don't count blah blah. Yes everyone knows good sites can be killed but you have to differentiate between bad sites, good with a small niche, and good killed by vengeful votes. You just lump everything into one pile. You got a simple site in UC without aid but you still think I had to trade for high ratings?
September 16th, 2009
(0)
You brought the attitude first, I treat people based on how they treat other people. If you don't want me to act like a pompous arrogant *ssh*le, don't be one yourself.
September 16th, 2009
(0)
Of course I changed my voting habits over the years. Ytmnd has changed a lot. Aside from gr33nscr33n asking me to prove that I could vote 1 without fear of the reprisal, I have only changed my voting habits based on the worsening of content, and the lessening of other users. I changed my habits because ytmnd got worse, not because you convinced me that I was an offensive upvoter.
September 16th, 2009
(0)
What I was alluding to earlier is that you shouldn't be proud of high ratings on this site, you shouldn't be concerned with them at all. You also shouldn't assume that your sites are always good. Your attitude is ridiculous: when you get good ratings, its deserved, when you get bad ratings, its a corruption of the system. Yes, I was just trolling you, I was giving you a taste of what you dish out. I was being intentionally dishonest. There are a lot of users who make worse sites, but my target was you.
September 16th, 2009
(0)
Anyway, I won't talk to you again if you wish.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
nicely done
November 23rd, 2006
(-1)
thanks
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
lol 5'd
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
It's good because it actually has a profound message.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
HHAHAHHAHAHAHA TRUE.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
How come when Dave Chappelle playing Rick James says "f*ck yo couch, n*gg*r" there's no press about it?
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
"How come when Dave Chappelle playing Rick James says "f*ck yo couch, n*gg*r" there's no press about it?" b/c n*gg*rs are hypocrits
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
EDIT FTW
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Also, people who can't see the difference between a black person and white person using "n*gg*r" need to just quit life.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
"Also, people who can't see the difference between a black person and white person using "n*gg*r" need to just quit life." Oops I forgot it's okay for one race to use a word, but not another. My bad! Hey wait, isn't discrimination based on race a pretty good definition of racism?
November 23rd, 2006
(-1)
^ yeah exactly. Double standards FTL.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
if i wasn't such a cracka *ss cracka maybe i'd side with black people. but seriously all he said was n*gg*r, chris rock said it himself "n*gg*rs f*ck everything up". Clearly the chocolate face in the audience was a n*gg*r, and rightfully deserved the title. Now if kramer would have said n*gg*, things might have been allright. He needs to get those ebonics down.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Life changing. Excellent. This is not only a great YTMND, it's a great moment for humanity.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
good job
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
:(
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
lol
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
too true
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Pretty much
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
hahahahahaha awesome. Its just a bunch of typical postmodern politically correct liberal bullsh*t as usual, kramer was right, he should have tried that during the 50s, and seen what happened. At least back then, blacks, who are equal to whites, ACTED equal. Way to disgrace the civil rights movement by acting like a f*ckin primate, you dumb n*gg*r! But of course now I'm a racist too, oops.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Wow. You guys are some of the most ignorant f*cking people I've ever seen. There are two words called "context" and "connotation", and I suggest that you morons look them up.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
There are two words called "celebrity" and "media," I suggest you look them up. Bascially, when anyone remotely well-known says anything controversial, they are the most hated and despised person in America until they apologize... and then everyone talks about insincere the apology was and I'm like wtf do I care about him, there are KKK members still out there that are 10 times worse than this every day.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Just remember: First amendment rights do not apply if you hurt someone’s feelings… Wait, what?
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
kramer has NO class
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
You really should removes those pops in it. http://download.yousendit.com/BD6D82886E53C431 Have some good audio.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
lol, 5'd for truth
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
clean up the sync for da 5
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
hey guys, why is n*gg*r on the word censor list but cracker isn't?
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
'How come when Dave Chappelle playing Rick James says "f*ck yo couch, n*gg*r" there's no press about it?' i can't believe someone took that seriously, lol
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Black man does that they think it is funny when a white man does they get all over the news and sh*t. Also big deal people do this all the time
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Why is bitch on lots of censors for websites but bastard isn't? Michael Richards wasn't just racist for calling someone a n*gg*r, he was racist for saying how they would be killed 50 years ago for talking like that to a white man.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
"Michael Richards wasn't just racist for calling someone a n*gg*r, he was racist for saying how they would be killed 50 years ago for talking like that to a white man." Then why is the press going on about his use of n*gg*r and not that? Also, he is right on that point.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
It's sad but true.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
5'd for truth
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
dude it would be funny if michael richards did it in a funny way. but HE FREAKED OUT. there is a difference between racy comedy and RACISM you idiots. if you can't tell why Michael Richards actions were wrong then you need to put a shotgun up to your face and pull the trigger so that you aren't wasting the resources of Earth for the rest of logical humanity.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
off topic but has anyone made a ytmnd called "What is n*gg*r?"
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
d1ggitydan: The blacks in the crowd were heckling Richards for quite some time, calling HIM racial slurs. When he finally fired back, I think it was in part to make a social statement; it was intended to shock people. If you cant comprehend why Richards was justified in his retaliatory insults, then you are just another sheep.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
I love how the black guy basically says "that's uncalled for, only blacks can call other blacks n*gg*r...you cracker" good site, 5'd
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Ummm... I think you all missed the point of why he got into such hot water. The lynching comment at the beginning is far worse then any of the "n*gg*r" comments. He was verbally assaulting him, the n*gg*r bits only added to it. And yes, cracker is a lot less offensive than n*gg*r. If you don't believe that, you are a moron. I don't recall Dave Chappelle, Chris Rock, or Eddie Murphy ever singling a white person out of an audience (heckler or not) and act like a Black Panther towards them.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
sync plz
November 23rd, 2006
(-1)
Hey onlyrealnumber, and faxter: Good job, you completely missed the point of this site. I am merely making a statement about how double standards still permeat society especially in a situation like this. It not right under any circumstance. Yes, Michael Richards was inappropriate, but so were the hecklers. They both deserve equal responsibility for what happened there, but the only person that took the blame was Michael Richards. Also Michael Richards was the only one that bothered to apologize. It's sad
November 23rd, 2006
(-1)
that this is still acceptable in the world...
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Amen. Double Standards FTL. I used to goto a school where black was the majority race. I heard blacks say cracker all the time but if you said n*gg*r and you wernt black, you were in hot water.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Equal responsibility? Comedians get heckled all the time. Someone like him should be above that.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Why is bitch on lots of censors for websites but bastard isn't? Michael Richards wasn't just racist for calling someone a n*gg*r, he was racist for saying how they would be killed 50 years ago for talking like that to a white man. it's true though. I am for equallity, either block all racist words, or block none. Not that the word offends, but racism like that offends me. As in cracker only offends me if n*gg*r offends you.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Amen. Double Standards FTL. I used to goto a school where black was the majority race. I heard blacks say cracker all the time but if you said n*gg*r and you wernt black, you were in hot water. Same here except for people who know me who are black aren't offended.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
the forums are more racist then kramer.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Racism is, for lack of better terminology, a buzz word which means nothing.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
Who else saw these guys trying to shake him down for some money when this first happened? The first time I heard this news, I said to myself "I wonder how long it's going to be before those guys try to sue him, claiming that theyre emotionally scarred?"
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
someone did a better one
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
On the one hand, there should have been security to warn the two guys to stop yelling out things during Richards' act. (and yes, it's blatantly obvious they're just trying to get attention and money by suing him.. typical) However, for Richards to say it's not racism "only anger" is laughable. He saw the guys, noted that they were black, and used that against them. That's racism, lol. If they had been fat white guys, he would've called them fat asses and none of this would've happened.
November 23rd, 2006
(0)
His career is pretty much done because most of society despises celebrities for their wealth, so they get no 'second chances' so to speak. He's never going to be poor though, because his fanbase will always be large enough for him to attract income.
November 24th, 2006
(-1)
@ kikicolon: O rly? Care to link to it for me?
November 24th, 2006
(-1)
^ Orly? The hecklers were not just "talking" to him. They were insulting him with racial slurs. They were just as bad as Michael, but strangely enough the only person who gets blamed for the whole incident is him. Just because those hecklers were black doesn't mean they should be able to get away with that. He handled the situation poorly and blew up in their faces but that doesn't change the facts.
November 24th, 2006
(0)
"Were the hecklers caught on tape like Rchards? Were they famous like Richards? There is more at work here than just race." As I understand it, yes, the entire set was taped, so they were also recorded as well. Interestingly enough, they dont release the entire video, just the parts with Micheal Richards' "tirade". His celebrity is the only other thing at work here besides his race. If this were a well-known black comedian who handled a heckler poorly, the brunt of the blame would be placed on the..
November 24th, 2006
(0)
white hecklers for "spewing hate" at the black performer, and the story would die down soon after the media consensus is that the black man was justified in his retalition. Maybe even with a few touching newscasts about the sad fact that racism still resides within some (white) people, and those white hecklers brought out the worst in society. You know damn well that if these situations were reversed and the white dudes tried to sue him, it would go nowhere; pundits and newscasters would say its absurd.
November 24th, 2006
(0)
1'd because the intended message is just stupid, considering everything else Richards said.
November 24th, 2006
(0)
What IS the intended message here? Why is it then stupid considering what Richards said? I cant speak for wisdumcube, but the way I interpreted this YTMND was showing the hypocritical disparity that exists today in a funny way. The message is valid nonetheless. You disagree with that?
November 25th, 2006
(-1)
"this YTMND was showing the hypocritical disparity that exists today in a funny way." ^You pretty much nailed it right on the head. I am in no way justify Michaels actions at all, I just making a statement that presents one of the great hypocrisies of our society.
November 26th, 2006
(-1)
^Uh no. That's not what I meant at all. You are putting words into my mouth.
November 27th, 2006
(0)
Faxtar, you obvioulsy have no arguement. Ill take your response as an acknowledgement of your defeat.
November 27th, 2006
(0)
clever and mildly racist, but aren't we all
November 27th, 2006
(0)
XD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
December 13th, 2006
(0)
N*gg*rs stink of feces
December 31st, 2006
(0)
it's not the fact that he said n*gg*r really that got in him sh*t.. it's how he used it.. he treated them like dirt and so on and they only did what was right which was to take it and send it right back to him (insults). Now waht the hecklers did wrong was they are now taking this to court FOR MONEY!! not for the fact that he should be arrested for his stupity but FOR MONEY! why MONEY!? does money bring back the dead? can money stop a meteor from smashing the earth? NO! so MONEY cannot justify that sh*t.
June 13th, 2008
(0)
omg GENIUS
September 20th, 2022
(0)
7