Scientology Lawsuit had ONE weakness
Created on: June 12th, 2006
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
Basically, parodying stuff is consitutional and is enforced by the first amendment.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.89) | 218 | 3 | 31 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7,643 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 43 | https://www.bing.com |
| 6 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 3 | http://www.google.com.hk |
| 1 | http://www.google.com |
I dig the stare decisis, but the YTMNDs listed in the complaint don't bear the same disclaimers, which I would latch on if I were a lawyer for those Scientologist freaks. That said, the disclaimer Max put up should keep the main site up, but if this is the only defence we can mount, I see all the named YTMNDs being deleted.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link