HaHa! Topical!
Created on: May 31st, 2006
Since it got deleted last night, here's the repost.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.99) | 193 | 2 | 40 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,290 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 47 | https://www.bing.com |
| 8 | http://www.google.com.hk |
| 8 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 3 | https://www.google.com/ |
| 1 | http://www.google.com/search?gcx=w&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=ha |
I'm going to go ahead and make this a semantics argument. You can argue that without the war, the money would be better off going to social programs and such, which is true. But now that we're in war, saying its a waste of money is the same as saying the money spent on the troops(keeping them armed, fed, protected and such) is also a waste, as much of the budget is for them. I don't think you're against the troops... like I said, just a semantics issue. Flame away if you'd like.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link